Re: Re: Buffer access rules, and a probable bug - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Re: Buffer access rules, and a probable bug
Date
Msg-id 27989.994266548@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Re: Buffer access rules, and a probable bug  ("Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
> As for HeapTupleSatisfies() there seems to be another choise to
> let HeapTupleSatisfiesAny() be equivalent to HeapTupleSatisfiesNow()
> other than always returning true.

Wouldn't that break the other uses of SnapshotAny?  I'm not sure
it's what nbtree.c wants, either, because then the heap_getnext
call wouldn't return recently-dead tuples at all.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: Backup and Recovery
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATE TABLE .. PRIMARY KEY quirk