Hmmm... my prior appends to this newsgroup are stalled. Hopefully,
they'll be available soon.
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> What you may really be saying is that the existing scheme for management
> of log segments is inappropriate for PIT usage; if so feel free to
> propose a better one. But I don't see how recycling of no-longer-wanted
> segments can break anything.
Yes, but in a very roundabout way (or so it seems). The main point
that I was trying to illustrate was that if a database supports
point-in-time recovery, recycling of the only available log segments
is a bad thing. And, yes, in practice if you have point-in-time
recovery enabled you better archive your logs with your backup to
ensure that you can roll forward as expected.
A possible solution (as I mentioned before)) is to have 2 methods
of logging available: circular and forward-recoverable. When a
database is created, the creator selects which type of logging to
perform. The log segments are exactly the same, only the recycling
method is different.
Hmmm... the more I look at this, the more interested I become.
Cheers,
Patrick
