Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

18 July 2001

• 00:50   Re: pg_depend Bruce Momjian
• 01:13   MySQL Gemini code Bruce Momjian
• 01:24   Re: pg_depend Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:31   Re: pg_depend Bruce Momjian
• 02:11   Re: pg_depend Philip Warner
• 05:47   Full Text Indexing Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 06:59   analyze strangeness Tim Allen
• 07:17   AW: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate ' em Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:27   Memory management jerome crouigneau
• 07:43   AW: Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recrea te 'emm Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:44   ERROR: SELECT DISTINCT ON with postgresql v 7.1.2 Jean-Michel Kelbert
• 08:21   ERROR: SELECT DISTINCT ON with postgresql v 7.1.2 Kelbert
• 09:47   Re: Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Gunnar Rønning
• 11:14   PQexec() 8191 bytes limit and text fields Steve Howe
• 11:29   Re: All computers in the world MUST sync with ATOMIC clock before 12:00 AM 21 July 2001!!! rick@edg.nl (Rick Schippers)
• 11:31   Re: MySQL Gemini code Jan Wieck
• 11:48   Re: All computers in the world MUST sync with ATOMIC clock before 12:00 AM 21 July 2001!!! Gorazd Bozic
• 12:03   C functions, variable number of params? mlw
• 13:49   Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Patrick Macdonald
• 14:01   Re: pg_depend Ross J. Reedstrom
• 14:04   Re: pg_depend Philip Warner
• 14:13   Re: pg_depend Ross J. Reedstrom
• 14:17   Re: PQexec() 8191 bytes limit and text fields Mitch Vincent
• 14:50   Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Tom Lane
• 14:59   Re: AW: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate ' em Tom Lane
• 15:51   Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Bruce Momjian
• 15:57   Re: pg_depend Tom Lane
• 16:02   Re: pg_depend Bruce Momjian
• 16:03   Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Patrick Macdonald
• 16:09   Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Patrick Macdonald
• 16:13   Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Bruce Momjian
• 16:22   Re: pg_depend Philip Warner
• 16:24   Re: Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Bruce Momjian
• 16:24   Re: pg_depend Bruce Momjian
• 16:26   Re: pg_depend Tom Lane
• 16:36   Re: analyze strangeness Tom Lane
• 16:38   Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Bruce Momjian
• 16:40   Re: pg_depend Tom Lane
• 16:47   Re: Full Text Indexing Tom Lane
• 17:06   Re: MySQL Gemini code Bruce Momjian
• 17:07   Re: ERROR: SELECT DISTINCT ON with postgresql v 7.1.2 Stephan Szabo
• 17:11   Re: PQexec() 8191 bytes limit and text fields Tom Lane
• 17:12   Re: pg_depend Bruce Momjian
• 17:19   Re: MySQL Gemini code Jan Wieck
• 17:20   Re: pg_depend Bill Studenmund
• 17:21   Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Bruce Momjian
• 17:37   Re: PQexec() 8191 bytes limit and text fields Steve Howe
• 17:37   OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 17:51   Re: pg_depend Tom Lane
• 17:52   Re: pg_depend Tom Lane
• 18:21   RE: pg_depend Hiroshi Inoue
• 18:30   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Lamar Owen
• 18:30   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 18:32   dependent dependants ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 18:36   Re: pg_depend Bruce Momjian
• 18:42   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
• 19:23   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
• 19:36   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 19:50   Re: Idea: recycle WAL segments, don't delete/recreate 'em Larry Rosenman
• 19:53   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Rod Taylor
• 20:04   Re: MySQL Gemini code ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 20:17   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 20:20   Re: MySQL Gemini code ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 20:21   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Lamar Owen
• 20:24   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Larry Rosenman
• 20:24   Re: MySQL Gemini code Michael Widenius
• 20:24   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
• 20:32   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
• 20:33   Re: [HACKERS - GENERAL] PQexec() 8191 bytes limit and text fields Mitch Vincent
• 20:33   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
• 20:34   RE: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Mikheev, Vadim
• 20:38   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
• 20:53   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 21:25   RE: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Mikheev, Vadim
• 21:28   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Larry Rosenman
• 21:43   Re: MySQL Gemini code teg@redhat.com (Trond Eivind Glomsrød)
• 22:12   Re: dependent dependants Tom Lane
• 22:19   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 22:27   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Lamar Owen
• 23:00   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 23:04   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 23:15   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
• 23:18   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Rod Taylor
• 23:21   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Ross J. Reedstrom
• 23:29   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 23:35   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 23:40   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 23:40   Re: MySQL Gemini code Jan Wieck
• 23:40   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
• 23:43   Re: MySQL Gemini code ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers)
• 23:45   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:49   Re: MySQL Gemini code Sascha Schumann
• 23:53   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 23:54   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:54   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Bruce Momjian
• 23:57   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane
• 23:58   Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend) Tom Lane