Re: pg_depend - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_depend
Date
Msg-id 6176.995477358@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to pg_depend  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes:
>> BTW, name alone is not a good enough referent for functions... you'd
>> have to store the argument types too.

> ??? Isn't an entry
>     pg_proc_relid
>     the oid of the function
>     pg_type_relid
>     the oid of an argument type
>     the name of the argument type
> made ?

That's the entry that was dropped, no?  Given a pg_depend row pointing
at a function named foo, with an OID that no longer exists, how will you
tell which of the (possibly many) functions named foo is wanted?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Steve Howe"
Date:
Subject: Re: PQexec() 8191 bytes limit and text fields
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_depend