Re: Re: [PATCH] To remove EXTEND INDEX - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Martijn van Oosterhout
Subject Re: Re: [PATCH] To remove EXTEND INDEX
Date
Msg-id 20010714103628.B11863@svana.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [PATCH] To remove EXTEND INDEX  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 06:34:22PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Let's drop the meta-discussions and cut to the chase: given that we are
> > about to re-enable partial indexes, should we try to make EXTEND INDEX
> > work too, or just remove it?
> 
> We don't let people add columns to an existing index so I don't see why
> we should have EXTEND INDEX unless index twiddling is more common with
> partial indexes.

We don't allow people currently to fiddle with indices at all. I don't
understand the origin of EXTEND INDEX since I can't think of a situation
where it would actually be useful.

-- 
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
http://svana.org/kleptog/
> It would be nice if someone came up with a certification system that
> actually separated those who can barely regurgitate what they crammed over
> the last few weeks from those who command secret ninja networking powers.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] To remove EXTEND INDEX
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] To remove EXTEND INDEX