> we noticed you changed gist.c to handle NULLS. It seems there is
> problem with your changes.
....
> I remind we have choosen to leave NULLs because vacuum complained about
> different number of tuples in heap and index and all our opclasses work
> correctly with NULLs. Did you change vacuum code so it will not complain ?
If the opclasses handle NULLs, then they should be in the index.
Leaving them out would imho be better handled with the partial index code.
Andreas
