Re: AW: pg_index.indislossy - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: AW: pg_index.indislossy
Date
Msg-id 11046.994801007@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: AW: pg_index.indislossy  (ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers))
List pgsql-hackers
ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers) writes:
> Seriously, "indislossy" is a singularly poor name for a predicate.

Perhaps, but it fits with the existing naming conventions for Postgres
catalog columns.  Unless we want to indulge in wholesale renaming of
the system's catalog columns (and break an awful lot of applications)
I'd resist any name for a pg_index column that's not of the form "indFOO".
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange query execution time
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: timestamp with/without time zone