Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

1 August 2009

• 15:57   Re: load / stress testing Dimitri Fontaine

2 August 2009

• 15:25   Re: Performance 8.4.0 Robert Haas
• 16:50   select count(idn) is slow (Seq Scan) instead of Bitmap Heap.. why? Adam PAPAI
• 17:17   Greenplum MapReduce Suvankar Roy
• 17:17   Why is PostgreSQL so slow on Windows ( Postgres 8.3.7) version parimala
• 17:17   Performance Monitoring tool mukeshp
• 17:17   Why is PostgreSQL so slow on Windows ( Postgres 8.3.7) version pari krishnan
• 17:17   SQL select query becomes slow when using limit (with no offset) Kees van Dieren
• 17:30   Re: Performance 8.4.0 Stephen Frost
• 18:08   Re: Performance Monitoring tool Frits Hoogland
• 20:31   Re: Why is PostgreSQL so slow on Windows ( Postgres 8.3.7) version PFC
• 20:56   Re: Why is PostgreSQL so slow on Windows ( Postgres 8.3.7) version Euler Taveira de Oliveira

3 August 2009

• 02:04   FW: Performance 8.4.0 Chris Dunn
• 02:05   Re: Greenplum MapReduce Chris
• 02:17   Re: FW: Performance 8.4.0 Robert Haas
• 09:25   Re: Greenplum MapReduce Richard Huxton
• 09:50   Re: Greenplum MapReduce Richard Huxton
• 11:14   Re: Why is PostgreSQL so slow on Windows ( Postgres 8.3.7) version Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
• 11:46   Re: Why is PostgreSQL so slow on Windows ( Postgres 8.3.7) version Marc Cousin
• 17:01   Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions Scott Carey
• 17:17   Query help Subbiah Stalin-XCGF84
• 18:56   Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions Tom Lane
• 19:28   Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions Scott Carey
• 19:49   Re: Query help Kevin Grittner
• 20:13   Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions PFC
• 20:20   Re: Query help Subbiah Stalin-XCGF84
• 20:45   Re: Query help Kevin Grittner
• 20:50   Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions Merlin Moncure
• 21:18   Re: Query help Subbiah Stalin-XCGF84
• 21:29   Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions PFC
• 21:49   Re: Greenplum MapReduce Suvankar Roy
• 21:50   Re: Greenplum MapReduce Suvankar Roy

4 August 2009

• 13:29   Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions Merlin Moncure
• 13:46   Re: select count(idn) is slow (Seq Scan) instead of Bitmap Heap.. why? Robert Haas
• 15:37   Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions Alvaro Herrera
• 15:57   Re: Query help Kevin Grittner
• 16:06   GiST, caching, and consistency Matthew Wakeling
• 17:14   Re: Query help Subbiah Stalin-XCGF84
• 17:32   Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions Scott Carey
• 20:41   Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions Tom Lane
• 21:16   postgresql and syslog Ibrahim Harrani
• 22:56   Re: GiST, caching, and consistency Robert Haas
• 23:03   CHECK constraint fails when it's not supposed to Richard Yen
• 23:28   Re: GiST, caching, and consistency Greg Stark
• 23:37   Re: CHECK constraint fails when it's not supposed to Greg Stark

5 August 2009

• 00:54   CHECK constraint fails when it's not supposed to richyen
• 05:02   Re: SQL select query becomes slow when using limit (with no offset) Kees van Dieren
• 10:20   Re: GiST, caching, and consistency Matthew Wakeling
• 10:23   Re: SQL select query becomes slow when using limit (with no offset) Russell Smith
• 13:43   Re: GiST, caching, and consistency Robert Haas
• 13:54   Re: GiST, caching, and consistency Matthew Wakeling
• 14:12   Re: GiST, caching, and consistency Tom Lane
• 14:13   Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions Merlin Moncure
• 17:00   Re: PostgreSQL 8.4 performance tuning questions Scott Carey
• 19:17   Re: Query help Subbiah Stalin-XCGF84
• 19:31   Re: Query help Scott Carey
• 19:42   Re: Query help Kevin Grittner

6 August 2009

• 02:51   Bottleneck? Ip Wing Kin John
• 04:19   Re: Bottleneck? Scott Marlowe
• 04:31   Re: Bottleneck? wkipjohn@gmail.com
• 04:53   Re: Bottleneck? Scott Marlowe
• 05:14   Re: Bottleneck? wkipjohn@gmail.com
• 05:21   Re: Bottleneck? wkipjohn@gmail.com
• 06:15   Re: Bottleneck? Scott Marlowe
• 06:23   Re: Bottleneck? Ip Wing Kin John
• 07:03   Re: Bottleneck? Scott Marlowe
• 14:53   Re: Bottleneck? Ray Stell
• 15:02   Re: Bottleneck? Tom Lane
• 15:43   Re: Bottleneck? Ray Stell
• 15:57   Re: Bottleneck? Kenneth Cox
• 16:13   Re: Bottleneck? Joshua D. Drake
• 16:38   Re: Bottleneck? Ray Stell
• 16:53   Re: Bottleneck? Joshua D. Drake
• 18:43   Best settings to load a fresh database Campbell, Lance
• 19:02   Re: Best settings to load a fresh database Scott Marlowe
• 19:02   Re: Best settings to load a fresh database Kenneth Marshall
• 19:33   Re: postgresql and syslog Robert Haas
• 23:12   Re: Bottleneck? Joshua D. Drake
• 23:52   Re: Bottleneck? Joshua D. Drake

7 August 2009

• 07:38   Re: Best settings to load a fresh database Euler Taveira de Oliveira
• 08:02   Re: SQL select query becomes slow when using limit (with no offset) Kees van Dieren
• 12:53   Re: SQL select query becomes slow when using limit (with no offset) Robert Haas
• 13:06   Re: postgresql and syslog Michael Nacos
• 19:57   Re: postgresql and syslog Alvaro Herrera
• 21:10   Re: SQL select query becomes slow when using limit (with no offset) Scott Carey
• 21:26   Need suggestions on kernel settings for dedicated FreeBSD/Postgresql machine Culley Harrelson

8 August 2009

• 00:09   PG-related ACM Article: "The Pathologies of Big Data" Josh Kupershmidt
• 00:28   Re: PG-related ACM Article: "The Pathologies of Big Data" Greg Stark
• 00:41   Re: PG-related ACM Article: "The Pathologies of Big Data" Scott Marlowe
• 00:42   Re: PG-related ACM Article: "The Pathologies of Big Data" Scott Marlowe
• 01:34   Re: PG-related ACM Article: "The Pathologies of Big Data" Scott Carey
• 03:04   Re: PG-related ACM Article: "The Pathologies of Big Data" Scott Marlowe
• 03:37   Re: SQL select query becomes slow when using limit (with no offset) Robert Haas
• 06:02   Re: [BUGS] BUG #4919: CREATE USER command slows down system performance Bruce Momjian
• 06:08   ORDER BY ... LIMIT and JOIN Fizu
• 09:24   Re: PG-related ACM Article: "The Pathologies of Big Data" Pierre Frédéric Caillaud
• 16:02   Re: [BUGS] BUG #4919: CREATE USER command slows down system performance Tom Lane
• 17:16   Re: ORDER BY ... LIMIT and JOIN Michael Andreen
• 17:57   Re: [BUGS] BUG #4919: CREATE USER command slows down system performance Alvaro Herrera
• 18:25   Re: [BUGS] BUG #4919: CREATE USER command slows down system performance Tom Lane
• 18:49   Re: [BUGS] BUG #4919: CREATE USER command slows down system performance Tom Lane
• 18:59   Re: [BUGS] BUG #4919: CREATE USER command slows down system performance Alvaro Herrera
• 19:15   Re: [BUGS] BUG #4919: CREATE USER command slows down system performance Tom Lane
• 19:21   Re: [BUGS] BUG #4919: CREATE USER command slows down system performance Alvaro Herrera
• 19:25   Re: [BUGS] BUG #4919: CREATE USER command slows down system performance Tom Lane
• 20:32   Re: [BUGS] BUG #4919: CREATE USER command slows down system performance Bruce Momjian

9 August 2009

• 03:41   Re: Need suggestions on kernel settings for dedicated FreeBSD/Postgresql machine Robert Haas
• 13:38   Re: Need suggestions on kernel settings for dedicated FreeBSD/Postgresql machine Culley Harrelson
• 19:26   Re: ORDER BY ... LIMIT and JOIN Fizu
• 23:04   Re: ORDER BY ... LIMIT and JOIN Michael Andreen

10 August 2009

• 01:30   Re: ORDER BY ... LIMIT and JOIN Robert Haas
• 06:22   Re: Bottleneck? Ip Wing Kin John
• 07:07   Re: Bottleneck? Scott Marlowe
• 12:02   Re: Bottleneck? Robert Haas
• 15:23   Re: SQL select query becomes slow when using limit (with no offset) Kevin Grittner
• 16:22   Re: SQL select query becomes slow when using limit (with no offset) Robert Haas
• 18:46   Re: SQL select query becomes slow when using limit (with no offset) Devin Ben-Hur

11 August 2009

• 21:14   Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Josh Berkus
• 21:35   Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Josh Berkus
• 21:46   Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Robert Haas
• 22:07   Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Josh Berkus

12 August 2009

• 00:54   Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Tom Lane
• 01:11   Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Robert Haas
• 16:41   transaction delays to apply Nickolay
• 18:23   Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Kevin Grittner
• 21:23   Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Tom Lane
• 21:32   Re: transaction delays to apply Pierre Frédéric Caillaud
• 21:33   Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Kevin Grittner
• 21:37   Re: transaction delays to apply Tom Lane
• 21:57   Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Tom Lane
• 23:49   Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Robert Haas

13 August 2009

• 04:02   Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Torsten Zühlsdorff
• 11:54   Re: transaction delays to apply Nickolay
• 13:52   Re: transaction delays to apply Nickolay
• 14:16   How to run this in reasonable time: Matthew Wakeling
• 14:26   Re: How to run this in reasonable time: Greg Stark
• 14:35   Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Kevin Grittner
• 14:36   Re: How to run this in reasonable time: Matthew Wakeling
• 16:08   Under the hood of views David Kerr
• 16:28   Re: Under the hood of views Richard Huxton
• 20:23   Less expensive proprietary or Open source ETL tools Rstat
• 20:23   Memory usage of writer process Alex
• 20:30   Re: Memory usage of writer process Alvaro Herrera
• 21:15   Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Josh Berkus
• 21:32   freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) Jeff Davis
• 21:43   Re: Memory usage of writer process Scott Carey
• 21:58   Re: [HACKERS] freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) Alvaro Herrera
• 22:17   Re: [HACKERS] freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age100m? ) Kevin Grittner
• 22:25   Re: [HACKERS] freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) Robert Haas
• 22:35   Re: Re: [HACKERS] freezing tuples ( was: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? ) Josh Berkus
• 23:04   Re: Under the hood of views David Kerr
• 23:14   Re: Under the hood of views Greg Stark

14 August 2009

• 03:11   Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? Robert Haas
• 18:10   Memory reporting on CentOS Linux Jeremy Carroll
• 19:43   Re: Memory reporting on CentOS Linux Reid Thompson
• 20:21   Re: Memory reporting on CentOS Linux Jeremy Carroll
• 20:21   Re: Memory reporting on CentOS Linux Scott Marlowe
• 20:23   Re: Memory reporting on CentOS Linux Scott Marlowe
• 20:37   Re: Memory reporting on CentOS Linux Scott Carey
• 21:26   Per-database warm standby? Craig James
• 22:05   Re: Per-database warm standby? Tom Lane
• 22:09   Re: Per-database warm standby? Alvaro Herrera
• 23:08   Re: Memory usage of writer process Alex Neth
• 23:08   Re: Scalability in postgres Jeff Janes
• 23:41   Re: Scalability in postgres Tom Lane

15 August 2009

• 14:26   Re: Memory reporting on CentOS Linux Jeremy Carroll
• 15:24   Re: Memory reporting on CentOS Linux Tom Lane
• 15:39   Re: Memory reporting on CentOS Linux Jeremy Carroll
• 16:19   Re: Memory reporting on CentOS Linux Mark Mielke
• 20:11   Re: Memory reporting on CentOS Linux Robert Haas

16 August 2009

• 01:36   Re: Per-database warm standby? Nickolay
• 09:15   Re: Scalability in postgres simon@2ndquadrant.com
• 13:21   Re: Less expensive proprietary or Open source ETL tools Jean-Max Reymond
• 22:53   Re: Scalability in postgres Jeff Janes

17 August 2009

• 11:03   Re: Memory reporting on CentOS Linux Matthew Wakeling
• 16:38   Getting time of a postgresql-request Kai Behncke
• 17:24   Re: Memory reporting on CentOS Linux Jeremy Carroll
• 20:49   number of rows estimation for bit-AND operation Slava Moudry
• 23:43   Re: Memory reporting on CentOS Linux Scott Carey

18 August 2009

• 02:35   Re: Memory reporting on CentOS Linux Scott Carey
• 04:26   Re: Getting time of a postgresql-request Russell Smith
• 04:33   Re: Memory reporting on CentOS Linux Greg Smith
• 07:09   Re: number of rows estimation for bit-AND operation Scott Marlowe
• 09:45   Re: Getting time of a postgresql-request Pierre Frédéric Caillaud
• 13:20   Weird index or sort behaviour Matthew Wakeling
• 14:12   Re: Need suggestions on kernel settings for dedicated FreeBSD/Postgresql machine Ivan Voras
• 15:05   Re: Weird index or sort behaviour Tom Lane
• 16:41   Re: Weird index or sort behaviour Matthew Wakeling
• 16:49   Re: Weird index or sort behaviour Tom Lane
• 16:57   Re: Weird index or sort behaviour Tom Lane
• 17:44   Re: Weird index or sort behaviour Greg Stark
• 17:57   Re: Weird index or sort behaviour Tom Lane
• 18:40   Re: Weird index or sort behaviour Matthew Wakeling
• 19:10   Re: Weird index or sort behaviour Tom Lane
• 20:00   SQL Query Performance - what gives? Karl Denninger
• 20:23   Re: SQL Query Performance - what gives? Kevin Grittner
• 21:00   Re: SQL Query Performance - what gives? Karl Denninger
• 21:58   Re: number of rows estimation for bit-AND operation Scott Marlowe
• 21:59   Re: SQL Query Performance - what gives? Kevin Grittner
• 22:34   Re: number of rows estimation for bit-AND operation Scott Marlowe
• 22:44   Re: number of rows estimation for bit-AND operation Slava Moudry
• 22:44   Re: number of rows estimation for bit-AND operation Slava Moudry
• 23:05   Re: SQL Query Performance - what gives? Karl Denninger

19 August 2009

• 02:02   Re: [SQL] SQL Query Performance - what gives? Tom Lane
• 02:49   Re: [SQL] SQL Query Performance - what gives? Karl Denninger
• 06:28   Re: [SQL] SQL Query Performance - what gives? Pierre Frédéric Caillaud
• 10:19   Re: SQL Query Performance - what gives? Ivan Voras
• 11:00   Re: Weird index or sort behaviour Matthew Wakeling
• 13:33   PG 8.3 and server load Phoenix Kiula
• 13:54   Re: PG 8.3 and server load Ivan Voras
• 14:23   Re: PG 8.3 and server load Guillaume Cottenceau
• 14:26   Re: PG 8.3 and server load Andy Colson
• 15:19   Re: PG 8.3 and server load Karl Denninger
• 15:25   Re: PG 8.3 and server load Andy Colson
• 15:29   Re: PG 8.3 and server load Phoenix Kiula
• 15:33   Re: PG 8.3 and server load Kevin Grittner
• 15:37   Re: PG 8.3 and server load Andy Colson
• 15:37   Re: PG 8.3 and server load Matthew Wakeling
• 15:40   Re: PG 8.3 and server load Phoenix Kiula
• 15:52   Re: PG 8.3 and server load Andy Colson
• 16:02   Re: PG 8.3 and server load Tom Lane
• 16:08   Re: PG 8.3 and server load Guillaume Cottenceau
• 16:19   Re: PG 8.3 and server load Scott Marlowe
• 16:28   Query tuning Kevin Kempter
• 16:38   Re: Query tuning Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz
• 17:17   Re: Query tuning Scott Carey
• 17:32   Re: Query tuning Nikolas Everett
• 17:37   Re: Query tuning Kevin Kempter
• 17:38   Re: Query tuning Kevin Kempter

20 August 2009

• 00:25   [PERFORMANCE] how to set wal_buffers Jaime Casanova
• 00:45   [PERFORMANCE] work_mem vs temp files issue Jaime Casanova
• 07:09   Number of tables Fabio La Farcioli
• 08:07   Re: Number of tables Jochen Erwied
• 08:16   Re: Number of tables Craig Ringer
• 08:35   Re: Number of tables Fabio La Farcioli
• 12:03   Re: Query tuning Віталій Тимчишин
• 12:51   Re: PG 8.3 and server load Ivan Voras
• 17:55   Re: number of rows estimation for bit-AND operation Robert Haas
• 20:16   Re: Number of tables Craig James
• 21:42   Re: Number of tables Greg Stark
• 22:27   Re: Number of tables Craig James
• 23:09   improving my query plan Kevin Kempter
• 23:53   Re: Number of tables Greg Stark

21 August 2009

• 00:39   Re: Number of tables Alvaro Herrera
• 00:54   Re: Number of tables Greg Stark
• 01:22   Re: improving my query plan Chris
• 01:32   Re: number of rows estimation for bit-AND operation Scott Marlowe
• 01:34   Re: improving my query plan Scott Carey
• 01:50   limiting results makes the query slower Jaime Casanova
• 01:58   Re: number of rows estimation for bit-AND operation Scott Marlowe
• 03:19   Re: number of rows estimation for bit-AND operation Slava Moudry
• 04:38   [PERFORMANCE] how to set wal_buffers Jeff Janes
• 14:14   Performance regression between 8.3 and 8.4 on heavy text indexing gael@pilotsystems.net (Gaël Le Mignot)
• 20:04   Re: number of rows estimation for bit-AND operation Robert Haas
• 20:12   Re: number of rows estimation for bit-AND operation Alvaro Herrera
• 20:50   Re: Number of tables Jerry Champlin
• 20:51   Re: number of rows estimation for bit-AND operation Slava Moudry

23 August 2009

• 00:40   Re: Number of tables Robert Haas
• 12:49   Re: Performance regression between 8.3 and 8.4 on heavy text indexing Guillaume Smet
• 20:26   Re: [PERFORMANCE] how to set wal_buffers Jaime Casanova
• 21:41   Re: limiting results makes the query slower Robert Haas
• 22:26   Re: [PERFORMANCE] how to set wal_buffers Jeff Janes

24 August 2009

• 06:54   postgresql uses Hash-join, i need Nested-loop Gábor Farkas
• 14:30   Re: Number of tables Kevin Grittner
• 14:37   Re: postgresql uses Hash-join, i need Nested-loop Tom Lane
• 14:45   Re: improving my query plan Kevin Grittner
• 16:51   Indexing on a circle datatype Gavin Love
• 17:04   Re: Indexing on a circle datatype Matthew Wakeling
• 17:06   Re: Indexing on a circle datatype Tom Lane
• 17:47   Re: Indexing on a circle datatype Gavin Love

25 August 2009

• 09:30   Fwd: How to create a multi-column index with 2 dates using 'gist'? Fred Janon
• 21:45   Re: [PERFORMANCE] how to set wal_buffers Jaime Casanova

26 August 2009

• 14:08   Re: Fwd: How to create a multi-column index with 2 dates using 'gist'? Matthew Wakeling
• 14:40   PostgreSQL does CAST implicitely between int and a domain derived from int Jean-Michel Pouré
• 15:00   Re: PostgreSQL does CAST implicitely between int and a domain derivedfrom int Kevin Grittner
• 16:04   Re: Performance regression between 8.3 and 8.4 on heavy text indexing gael@pilotsystems.net (Gaël Le Mignot)
• 16:31   Re: Performance regression between 8.3 and 8.4 on heavy text indexing Tom Lane
• 17:31   Performance issues with large amounts of time-series data Hrishikesh (हृषीकेश मेहेंदळे)
• 18:01   Re: Performance issues with large amounts of time-series data Tom Lane
• 18:49   Re: Performance issues with large amounts of time-series data Hrishikesh (हृषीकेश मेहेंदळे)
• 18:57   Re: Performance issues with large amounts of time-series data Tom Lane
• 20:50   Re: Performance issues with large amounts of time-series data Greg Stark
• 21:59   Re: Performance regression between 8.3 and 8.4 on heavy text indexing Guillaume Smet
• 23:03   Re: PostgreSQL does CAST implicitely between int and a domain derived from int Kevin Grittner
• 23:27   Re: PostgreSQL does CAST implicitely between int and a domain derived from int Kevin Grittner

27 August 2009

• 13:35   Re: PostgreSQL does CAST implicitely between int and a domain derived from int Jean-Michel Pouré
• 13:52   Re: PostgreSQL does CAST implicitely between int and a domain derived from int Jean-Michel Pouré
• 14:07   Re: PostgreSQL does CAST implicitely between int and adomain derived from int Kevin Grittner
• 14:17   Re: PostgreSQL does CAST implicitely between int and adomain derived from int Jean-Michel Pouré
• 14:18   Re: PostgreSQL does CAST implicitely between int and adomain derived from int Kevin Grittner
• 14:37   Re: PostgreSQL does CAST implicitely between int and adomain derived from int Jean-Michel Pouré
• 14:53   Re: PostgreSQL does CAST implicitely between int andadomain derived from int Kevin Grittner
• 15:10   Re: PostgreSQL does CAST implicitely between int andadomain derived from int Jean-Michel Pouré
• 16:36   Re: PostgreSQL does CAST implicitely between int and a domain derived from int Kevin Grittner
• 17:01   Re: PostgreSQL Jean-Michel Pouré
• 17:35   Re: PostgreSQL does CAST implicitely between int and a domain derived from int Robert Haas
• 18:05   Re: PostgreSQL does CAST implicitely between int and a domain derived from int Tom Lane
• 20:03   Re: Performance regression between 8.3 and 8.4 on heavy text indexing gael@pilotsystems.net (Gaël Le Mignot)
• 22:20   Re: Performance regression between 8.3 and 8.4 on heavy text indexing Guillaume Smet
• 22:30   Re: PostgreSQL does CAST implicitely between int and a domain derived from int Jean-Michel Pouré
• 22:31   Re: PostgreSQL does CAST implicitely between int and a domain derived from int Jean-Michel Pouré
• 22:57   Re: Performance issues with large amounts of time-series data Greg Smith
• 23:02   Vacuum duration + hint bits? bricklen
• 23:05   Re: Vacuum duration + hint bits? Tom Lane

28 August 2009

• 00:20   Re: Vacuum duration + hint bits? bricklen
• 06:58   What exactly is postgres doing during INSERT/UPDATE ? Joseph S
• 07:52   Re: What exactly is postgres doing during INSERT/UPDATE ? Pierre Frédéric Caillaud
• 08:08   Re: What exactly is postgres doing during INSERT/UPDATE ? Greg Smith
• 08:29   Re: What exactly is postgres doing during INSERT/UPDATE ? Scott Marlowe
• 14:28   Re: What exactly is postgres doing during INSERT/UPDATE ? Joseph S
• 14:58   Re: What exactly is postgres doing during INSERT/UPDATE ? Joseph S
• 21:02   Memory monitoring tool Jean-Michel Pouré
• 23:16   Re: Memory monitoring tool Josh Berkus

29 August 2009

• 00:20   Re: What exactly is postgres doing during INSERT/UPDATE ? Jeff Janes
• 04:20   Re: What exactly is postgres doing during INSERT/UPDATE ? Luke Koops
• 08:46   Re: What exactly is postgres doing during INSERT/UPDATE ? Greg Stark
• 13:26   Re: What exactly is postgres doing during INSERT/UPDATE ? Merlin Moncure
• 13:59   Re: What exactly is postgres doing during INSERT/UPDATE ? Scott Marlowe
• 15:16   Re: PostgreSQL does CAST implicitely between int and a domain derived from int Bruce Momjian
• 17:38   Re: PostgreSQL does CAST implicitely between int and a domain derived from int Jean-Michel Pouré
• 17:44   Re: PostgreSQL does CAST implicitely between int and a domain derived from int Tom Lane
• 19:52   Re: What exactly is postgres doing during INSERT/UPDATE ? David Rees
• 20:59   Re: PostgreSQL does CAST implicitely between int and a domain derived from int Jean-Michel Pouré
• 21:45   Re: PostgreSQL does CAST implicitely between int and a domain derived from int Tom Lane
• 21:49   Re: PostgreSQL does CAST implicitely between int and a domain derived from int Greg Stark
• 22:01   Re: What exactly is postgres doing during INSERT/UPDATE ? Jeff Janes

30 August 2009

• 15:40   Re: What exactly is postgres doing during INSERT/UPDATE ? Merlin Moncure
• 15:52   Re: What exactly is postgres doing during INSERT/UPDATE ? Greg Stark
• 17:36   Re: What exactly is postgres doing during INSERT/UPDATE ? Mark Mielke
• 20:28   Re: What exactly is postgres doing during INSERT/UPDATE ? Joseph S
• 22:57   Re: What exactly is postgres doing during INSERT/UPDATE ? Merlin Moncure
• 23:39   Re: What exactly is postgres doing during INSERT/UPDATE ? Greg Stark

31 August 2009

• 14:38   Re: What exactly is postgres doing during INSERT/UPDATE ? Merlin Moncure
• 14:48   Re: What exactly is postgres doing during INSERT/UPDATE ? Aidan Van Dyk
• 15:24   Re: What exactly is postgres doing during INSERT/UPDATE ? Jeff Janes
• 16:31   Re: What exactly is postgres doing during INSERT/UPDATE ? Kevin Grittner
• 19:16   Re: What exactly is postgres doing during INSERT/UPDATE ? Scott Marlowe