Re: FW: Performance 8.4.0 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: FW: Performance 8.4.0
Date
Msg-id 603c8f070908021916r48ebab0ya43e556add3e6a00@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to FW: Performance 8.4.0  (Chris Dunn <chris.dunn@bigredsky.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Chris Dunn<chris.dunn@bigredsky.com> wrote:
> The database is 8gb currently. Use to be a lot bigger but we removed all large objects out and developed a file
serverstorage for it, and using default page costs for 8.4, I did have it changed in 8.1.4 

You might want to play with lowering them.  The default page costs
make page accesses expensive relative to per-tuple operations, which
is appropriate if you are I/O-bound but not so much if you are CPU
bound, and especially if the whole database is memory resident.  I'd
try something like random_page_cost = seq_page_cost = 0.1 for
starters, or whatever values were working for you in 8.1, but the
sweet spot may be higher or lower.

...Robert

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Chris
Date:
Subject: Re: Greenplum MapReduce
Next
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: Greenplum MapReduce