Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m?
Date
Msg-id 4A81EB7E.4050003@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
> I don't think that's the name of the parameter, since a Google search
> gives zero hits.  There are so many fiddly parameters for this thing
> that I don't want to speculate about which one you meant.

Sorry, subject line had it correct.

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/runtime-config-client.html#GUC-VACUUM-FREEZE-MIN-AGE


--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
www.pgexperts.com

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is vacuum_freeze_min_age 100m?