Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

22 June 2006

• 01:41   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Christopher Browne
• 02:13   Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Bruce Momjian
• 03:32   Problem to "current-status information in shared memory" patch Qingqing Zhou
• 03:48   Re: Problem to "current-status information in shared memory" patch Tom Lane
• 04:41   Re: Problem to "current-status information in shared memory" patch Qingqing Zhou
• 06:00   let's meet Wilbur
• 06:00   Re: Rethinking stats communication mechanisms Kenneth Marshall
• 06:00   Re: Rethinking stats communication mechanisms Kenneth Marshall
• 06:31   Re: let's meet Marc G. Fournier
• 07:09   Re: CVS HEAD busted on Windows? Dave Page
• 09:05   Re: checking on buildfarm member thrush Gaetano Mendola
• 10:35   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward
• 11:54   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
• 12:02   xlog viewer proposal Diogo Biazus
• 12:45   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Christopher Browne
• 13:05   Re: CVS HEAD busted on Windows? Andrew Dunstan
• 13:13   Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted on Windows?) Dave Page
• 13:22   Re: [PERFORM] Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL David Roussel
• 13:26   Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe Andrew Dunstan
• 13:28   Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted on Windows?) Hiroshi Saito
• 13:40   Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe Dave Page
• 13:42   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward
• 13:45   Re: checking on buildfarm member thrush Tom Lane
• 13:52   Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted on Windows?) Tom Lane
• 13:58   Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted Andrew Dunstan
• 13:59   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Alvaro Herrera
• 14:19   Re: [PERFORM] Sun Donated a Sun Fire T2000 to the PostgreSQL Arjen van der Meijden
• 14:20   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jonah H. Harris
• 14:20   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Csaba Nagy
• 14:36   Re: Problem to "current-status information in shared memory" patch Tom Lane
• 14:48   Re: shall we have a TRACE_MEMORY mode korry
• 15:02   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mario Weilguni
• 15:37   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Tom Lane
• 15:42   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Hannu Krosing
• 15:46   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Hannu Krosing
• 16:16   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward
• 16:22   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jonah H. Harris
• 16:24   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward
• 16:37   Re: xlog viewer proposal Tom Lane
• 16:50   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Tom Lane
• 16:52   Re: Going for "all green" buildfarm results Andrew Dunstan
• 16:53   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jochem van Dieten
• 16:59   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Lukas Smith
• 17:00   Re: xlog viewer proposal Jonah H. Harris
• 17:01   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Lukas Smith
• 17:04   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Chris Browne
• 17:07   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jonah H. Harris
• 17:08   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC D'Arcy J.M. Cain
• 17:25   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Rod Taylor
• 17:29   Re: xlog viewer proposal Tom Lane
• 17:32   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward
• 17:33   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Rod Taylor
• 17:37   Re: xlog viewer proposal Jonah H. Harris
• 17:39   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward
• 17:42   Re: Going for "all green" buildfarm results Neil Conway
• 17:42   Re: let's meet Josh Berkus
• 17:42   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jonah H. Harris
• 17:48   Re: Going for "all green" buildfarm results Tom Lane
• 17:50   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Rod Taylor
• 17:50   Re: let's meet Marc G. Fournier
• 17:51   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Magnus Hagander
• 17:52   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Heikki Linnakangas
• 17:57   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Greg Stark
• 17:57   Re: xlog viewer proposal Tom Lane
• 17:57   Re: xlog viewer proposal Diogo Biazus
• 18:03   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Lukas Smith
• 18:09   Re: let's meet A.M.
• 18:09   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Tom Lane
• 18:11   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Josh Berkus
• 18:19   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Tom Lane
• 18:24   Re: xlog viewer proposal Diogo Biazus
• 18:25   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Tom Lane
• 18:25   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Rod Taylor
• 18:26   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC PFC
• 18:33   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Tom Lane
• 18:37   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Alvaro Herrera
• 18:40   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Josh Berkus
• 18:43   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward
• 18:47   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Bort, Paul
• 18:50   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Greg Stark
• 19:08   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Tom Lane
• 19:09   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Josh Berkus
• 20:02   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC PFC
• 20:12   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 20:13   Re: xlog viewer proposal Jonah H. Harris
• 20:14   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Andrew Dunstan
• 20:19   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward
• 20:20   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Andrew Dunstan
• 20:21   Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 20:22   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC David Fetter
• 20:29   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jim Nasby
• 20:31   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jim Nasby
• 20:42   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jim Nasby
• 20:49   Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Tom Lane
• 20:58   Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 21:06   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Tom Lane
• 21:09   Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Tom Lane
• 21:22   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Tom Lane
• 21:31   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Tom Lane
• 21:37   Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 21:42   Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Tom Lane
• 21:59   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Alvaro Herrera
• 22:04   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Larry Rosenman
• 22:09   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Andrew Dunstan
• 22:18   Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Alvaro Herrera
• 23:28   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Andrew Dunstan
• 23:40   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Tom Lane
• 23:56   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Andrew Dunstan