Dave Page wrote:
>>Won't we still need to know if we are called as postmaster or
>>postgres?
>>
>>
>
>Unless the 'postmaster' instance starts all it's sub processes with an
>additional option to tell them they're children (I haven't looked at the
>code yet so I dunno if this is how it's done).
>
>For those that are unaware, because Windows doesn't support symlinks, we
>currently ship two copies of the binary. We could save 3.2MB
>(uncompressed, 8.1.4) if we could lose one of them.
>
>
>
>
Windows children could be handled, I think, but here is also standalone
postgres.
3.2 Mb is not insignificant, but I think we can live with it.
cheers
andrew
