Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted
Date
Msg-id 449AA208.3060607@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted on Windows?)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

>>>Won't we still need to know if we are called as postmaster or 
>>>postgres?
>>>      
>>>
>
>No.  The entire point of the recent changes is that the behavior no
>longer depends on the name of the executable, only on the switches.
>
>
>  
>

Oh. My mistake. That sounds good.

cheers

andrew


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted on Windows?)
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC