Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bort, Paul
Subject Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions
Date
Msg-id DB106B1B5B8F734B8FF3E155A3A556C202D4FC2C@clemail1.tmwsystems.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
>
> so presumably this is only needed for old Cygwin versions.  Can anyone
> say how old "1001" is and whether we still ought to care about it?
>

IIRC, I've been on 1.5.x for at least three years. 1.0/1.1 seems to be
around 2000/2001, based on a quick Google. So it's definitely older than
PG 7.3.

Regards,
Paul Bort


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Mark Woodward"
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC