Bort, Paul wrote:
>>so presumably this is only needed for old Cygwin versions. Can anyone
>>say how old "1001" is and whether we still ought to care about it?
>>
>>
>>
>
>IIRC, I've been on 1.5.x for at least three years. 1.0/1.1 seems to be
>around 2000/2001, based on a quick Google. So it's definitely older than
>PG 7.3.
>
>
1.3 was announced in May 2001 according to the cygwin announce mailing
list archives, so I think we can safely ignore the section in question.
If anyone hasn't upgraded their cygwin since then they probably have
more problems than this would give them.
cheers
andrew
