Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions
Date
Msg-id 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FA7A@algol.sollentuna.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > item #2: Is dllinit.c GPL code?
> > The file dllinit.c, located in the src/utils directory
> documents the
> > author as Mumit Khan.  Did Mumit Khan contribute this code
> and did he
> > contribute it for distribution under the PostgreSQL license?  If I
> > read correctly, the name stamp in CVS does not indicate that Mumit
> > Khan directly contributed this file.  I ask because this
> question has
> > surfaced as a forum item for a different project and Mumit Khan
> > directly answered their forum posting
> (http://curl.haxx.se/mail/lib-2002-11/0061.html).
>
> Per the comments in that thread, it would be pretty trivial
> to either rewrite or remove this file.  I don't think there
> is anything there that amounts to protectable content (and
> Mumit evidently agrees, see link) but let's do something
> about it anyway.  Can some of the Windows folk check whether
> we can just remove it?

I don't think it's needed on Win32. It's not included in my VC++ build,
because I forgot it :-), and it works just fine.

The point is that as long as we don't do anything in it (which we
don't), the runtime supplied default should be just fine.

I can't speak for cygwin, just standard win32.

//Magnus


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: let's meet
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC