Re: Going for "all green" buildfarm results - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Going for "all green" buildfarm results
Date
Msg-id 449ACAD3.8000800@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Going for "all green" buildfarm results  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Going for "all green" buildfarm results  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
Re: Going for "all green" buildfarm results  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

Mark Wong wrote:

>>
>> Now why are we failing on 7.3? What version of flex do you have? If 
>> it's too modern we'll just need to take 7.3 out of the cobra and 
>> stoat rotations - we'd really only make supercritical fixes on that 
>> branch these days.
>
>
> Flex is 2.5.33 on both systems.  I'm assuming that's too modern so 
> I'll go ahead and stop building 7.3 for those systems.


You could be lucky the others build. I believe our supported version is 
still 2.5.4, which is what all my linux systems have.

cheers

andrew




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
Next
From: "Jochem van Dieten"
Date:
Subject: Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC