Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

6 March 2012

• 01:14   Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 01:18   Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation Bruce Momjian
• 03:38   Re: Dropping PL language retains support functions Tom Lane
• 05:08   Re: ECPG FETCH readahead Boszormenyi Zoltan
• 05:44   Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Pavel Stehule
• 07:12   Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq Alexander Shulgin
• 07:13   Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage Marko Kreen
• 07:52   Re: Checksums, state of play Simon Riggs
• 08:34   Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER? Pavel Stehule
• 08:55   Re: RFC: Making TRUNCATE more "MVCC-safe" Noah Misch
• 09:10   Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server Albe Laurenz
• 09:44   Re: RFC: Making TRUNCATE more "MVCC-safe" Noah Misch
• 10:07   Re: ECPG FETCH readahead Noah Misch
• 11:06   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove extra copies of LogwrtResult. Fujii Masao
• 11:09   Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server Shigeru Hanada
• 11:37   Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server Shigeru Hanada
• 11:52   Re: Scaling XLog insertion (was Re: Moving more work outside WALInsertLock) Fujii Masao
• 12:21   Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Alvaro Herrera
• 12:24   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove extra copies of LogwrtResult. Robert Haas
• 12:33   Pg 9.2 extension install Misa Simic
• 12:36   Re: RFC: Making TRUNCATE more "MVCC-safe" Robert Haas
• 13:13   Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Pavel Stehule
• 13:15   Re: [v9.2] Add GUC sepgsql.client_label Kohei KaiGai
• 13:20   Re: Scaling XLog insertion (was Re: Moving more work outside WALInsertLock) Fujii Masao
• 13:25   Re: Checksums, state of play Robert Haas
• 13:30   Re: performance-test farm Robert Haas
• 13:32   Re: CLUSTER VERBOSE (9.1.3) Robert Haas
• 13:48   Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server Albe Laurenz
• 13:48   Re: Pg 9.2 extension install Misa Simic
• 13:57   Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database Robert Haas
• 14:07   Re: Scaling XLog insertion (was Re: Moving more work outside WALInsertLock) Heikki Linnakangas
• 14:11   Re: Scaling XLog insertion (was Re: Moving more work outside WALInsertLock) Robert Haas
• 14:13   Re: Scaling XLog insertion (was Re: Moving more work outside WALInsertLock) Tom Lane
• 14:16   Re: Dropping PL language retains support functions Bruce Momjian
• 14:21   Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database Tom Lane
• 14:32   Re: Checksums, state of play Simon Riggs
• 14:33   [9.2] Confusion over CacheRegisterSyscacheCallback Marko Kreen
• 14:34   Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database Pavel Stehule
• 14:37   Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database Robert Haas
• 14:38   Re: Dropping PL language retains support functions Tom Lane
• 14:40   Re: Checksums, state of play Simon Riggs
• 14:48   Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database Tom Lane
• 15:07   Re: Checksums, state of play Simon Riggs
• 15:09   Re: Checksums, state of play Robert Haas
• 15:10   Re: [9.2] Confusion over CacheRegisterSyscacheCallback Tom Lane
• 15:27   Re: Dropping PL language retains support functions Bruce Momjian
• 15:36   Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database Alvaro Herrera
• 15:42   Re: Checksums, state of play Robert Haas
• 15:51   Re: Checksums, state of play Simon Riggs
• 16:00   Re: Checksums, state of play Simon Riggs
• 16:14   Re: Checksums, state of play Robert Haas
• 16:14   Re: Checksums, state of play Heikki Linnakangas
• 16:15   Re: Checksums, state of play Robert Haas
• 16:21   Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database Artur Litwinowicz
• 16:23   Re: Checksums, state of play Simon Riggs
• 16:24   Re: Checksums, state of play Simon Riggs
• 16:30   Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq Peter Eisentraut
• 16:37   Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database Christopher Browne
• 16:44   Re: Checksums, state of play Robert Haas
• 16:47   Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database Robert Haas
• 16:50   Re: Checksums, state of play Bruce Momjian
• 16:56   Re: Checksums, state of play Bruce Momjian
• 16:58   Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database Pavel Stehule
• 17:00   Re: Checksums, state of play Simon Riggs
• 17:04   Re: Checksums, state of play Tom Lane
• 17:15   Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database Alvaro Herrera
• 17:16   Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database Merlin Moncure
• 17:23   Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database Christopher Browne
• 17:39   Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database Jaime Casanova
• 17:40   Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server Tom Lane
• 17:52   Re: Checksums, state of play Bruce Momjian
• 17:59   patch for a locale-specific bug in regression tests (REL9_1_STABLE) Tomas Vondra
• 18:10   Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database Josh Berkus
• 18:12   Re: logging in high performance systems. Tom Lane
• 18:15   Re: Checksums, state of play Simon Riggs
• 18:24   Re: Checksums, state of play Bruce Momjian
• 18:27   Re: Checksums, state of play Bruce Momjian
• 18:34   Re: Scaling XLog insertion (was Re: Moving more work outside WALInsertLock) Heikki Linnakangas
• 18:38   Re: [9.2] Confusion over CacheRegisterSyscacheCallback Marko Kreen
• 18:40   Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Alvaro Herrera
• 18:58   Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Simon Riggs
• 19:07   Re: Checksums, state of play Robert Haas
• 19:28   Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Simon Riggs
• 19:29   Re: Dropping PL language retains support functions Peter Eisentraut
• 19:30   Re: Checksums, state of play Marcin Mańk
• 19:33   Re: Scaling XLog insertion (was Re: Moving more work outside WALInsertLock) Tom Lane
• 19:38   Re: Patch review for logging hooks (CF 2012-01) Tom Lane
• 20:05   Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Dimitri Fontaine
• 20:10   Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Robert Haas
• 20:16   Re: Dropping PL language retains support functions Robert Haas
• 20:19   Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Thom Brown
• 20:26   Re: How to know a table has been modified? Dimitri Fontaine
• 20:27   Re: [9.2] Confusion over CacheRegisterSyscacheCallback Tom Lane
• 20:28   Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Alvaro Herrera
• 20:29   Re: logging in high performance systems. Robert Haas
• 20:29   Re: Trigger execution role Dimitri Fontaine
• 20:32   Pg 9.2 extension install Misa Simic
• 20:33   Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Simon Riggs
• 20:35   Re: Initial 9.2 pgbench write results Jeff Janes
• 20:41   Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt Robert Haas
• 20:44   Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database Dimitri Fontaine
• 20:48   Re: Dropping PL language retains support functions Peter Eisentraut
• 20:52   Re: Initial 9.2 pgbench write results Robert Haas
• 20:53   Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement Pavel Stehule
• 20:56   Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database Merlin Moncure
• 21:01   Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database Alvaro Herrera
• 21:08   Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database Merlin Moncure
• 21:26   Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database Alvaro Herrera
• 21:53   Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database Tom Lane
• 22:12   Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database Christopher Browne
• 22:26   Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 Thom Brown
• 22:31   Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database Andrew Dunstan
• 22:49   Re: elegant and effective way for running jobs inside a database Daniel Farina
• 23:02   Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server Tom Lane
• 23:44   Re: Speed dblink using alternate libpq tuple storage Kyotaro HORIGUCHI