Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Albe Laurenz
Subject Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Date
Msg-id D960CB61B694CF459DCFB4B0128514C2079500DD@exadv11.host.magwien.gv.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server  (Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server  (Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Shigeru Hanada wrote:
>                Connection should be closed only when the trigger is a
> top level transaction and it's aborting, but isTopLevel flag was not
> checked.  I fixed the bug and added regression tests for such cases.

I wondered about that - is it really necessary to close the remote
connection? Wouldn't a ROLLBACK on the remote connection be good enough?

Yours,
Laurenz Albe


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: CLUSTER VERBOSE (9.1.3)
Next
From: Misa Simic
Date:
Subject: Re: Pg 9.2 extension install