On 6 March 2012 21:04, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote:
>>> [CASCADE will not run the command triggers for cascaded objects]
>> If these are all expected, does it in any way compromise the
>> effectiveness of DDL triggers in major use-cases?
>
> I don't think so. When replicating the replica will certainly drop the
> same set of dependent objects, for example. Auditing is another story.
> Do we want to try having cascaded object support in drop commands?
I wasn't sure if auditing was one of the rationale behind the feature
or not. If it is, it presents a major problem. How does the replica
know that the objects were dropped?
Thanks for the updated patch and the quick turnaround time. I'll give
it another review.
--
Thom
