Commit b5282aa893: "Revise sinval code to remove no-longer-used tuple TID from inval messages."
dropped ItemPointer from callbacks and replaced it with "hashValue".
There seems to be 2 ways that new backend code calculates it:
- hashoid(oid), which seems to assume too much?
- CatalogCacheComputeTupleHashValue(), which is 'static'.
So my question is that after doing generic SearchSysCache() like:
tup = SearchSysCache(USERMAPPINGUSERSERVER, ObjectIdGetDatum(user_mapping->userid),
ObjectIdGetDatum(foreign_server->serverid), 0, 0);
what is the proper way to calculate the hashValue that
will be given to callback?
--
marko