Re: Checksums, state of play - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Checksums, state of play
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMKvmQVTHhU=wyDRqzTMem-gfbhZp4U1c=STJ728szoc+Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Checksums, state of play  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Checksums, state of play  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: Checksums, state of play  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:

> As to whether we should increment pd_pagesize_version, I'm not sure
> quite what you were saying about that (I think you may have an extra
> or missing word there), but I don't think it's necessary here.

I said this...

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Do you know of any PostgreSQL variant that can set this byte range to
> different values?

Not sure what the missing word is there, so I'll ask again.

Has EDB or anybody else you know of has used the pd_pagesize_version
field for something else, so you'd rather I didn't touch that?

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Checksums, state of play
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Checksums, state of play