Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Pavel Stehule
Subject Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
Date
Msg-id CAFj8pRANebhmVDaR0gAZzP9DnJpXQnTQgnuUjJ7eR-Ogp_jG0Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hello

* I refreshed regress tests and appended tests for multi lines query
* There are enhanced checking of SELECT INTO statement
* I fixed showing details and hints

Regards

Pavel Stehule


2012/3/5 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>:
> Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of lun mar 05 13:02:50 -0300 2012:
>> small fix of CheckFunctionById function
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> p.s. Alvaro, please, send your patch and I'll merge it
>
> Here it is, with your changes already merged.  I also added back the
> new reference doc files which were dropped after the 2012-01-01 version.
> Note I haven't touched or read the plpgsql checker code at all (only
> some automatic indentation changes IIRC).  I haven't verified the
> regression tests either.
>
> FWIW I'm not going to participate in the other thread; neither I am
> going to work any more on this patch until the other thread sees some
> reasonable conclusion.
>
> --
> Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
> PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Boszormenyi Zoltan
Date:
Subject: Re: ECPG FETCH readahead
Next
From: Alexander Shulgin
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: URI connection string support for libpq