Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
Date
Msg-id 1330970654-sup-8562@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
List pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of lun mar 05 13:02:50 -0300 2012:
> small fix of CheckFunctionById function
>
> Regards
>
> p.s. Alvaro, please, send your patch and I'll merge it

Here it is, with your changes already merged.  I also added back the
new reference doc files which were dropped after the 2012-01-01 version.
Note I haven't touched or read the plpgsql checker code at all (only
some automatic indentation changes IIRC).  I haven't verified the
regression tests either.

FWIW I'm not going to participate in the other thread; neither I am
going to work any more on this patch until the other thread sees some
reasonable conclusion.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Parameterized-path cost comparisons need some work