Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

27 February 2007

• 00:08   Re: Proposal for Implenting read-only queries during wal replay (SoC 2007) Merlin Moncure
• 00:46   Re: Load distributed checkpoint Josh Berkus
• 01:10   Re: Load distributed checkpoint ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 01:11   Re: Seeking Google SoC Mentors Tom Lane
• 01:12   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Matthew T. O'Connor
• 01:22   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Tom Lane
• 01:26   Re: Seeking Google SoC Mentors Joshua D. Drake
• 01:36   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Matthew T. O'Connor
• 01:37   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Jim C. Nasby
• 01:41   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Jim C. Nasby
• 01:44   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Jeff Davis
• 01:44   Re: Resumable vacuum proposal and design overview Galy Lee
• 01:47   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Jim C. Nasby
• 01:47   Re: Seeking Google SoC Mentors Tom Lane
• 02:01   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Alvaro Herrera
• 02:02   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Tom Lane
• 02:07   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Tom Lane
• 02:07   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Alvaro Herrera
• 02:08   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Alvaro Herrera
• 02:08   Dead Space Map version 2 ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 02:10   Re: SCMS question mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 02:15   Re: Resumable vacuum proposal and design overview Tom Lane
• 02:18   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Matthew T. O'Connor
• 02:26   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Tom Lane
• 02:26   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Matthew T. O'Connor
• 02:32   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Matthew T. O'Connor
• 02:43   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Tom Lane
• 02:46   Expanding DELETE/UPDATE returning Rusty Conover
• 02:48   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Tom Lane
• 02:51   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Matthew T. O'Connor
• 02:53   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Matthew T. O'Connor
• 03:04   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Tom Lane
• 03:05   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Jeroen T. Vermeulen
• 03:07   Re: [PATCHES] COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option (patch) Tom Lane
• 03:14   Re: Expanding DELETE/UPDATE returning Tom Lane
• 03:43   Re: Seeking Google SoC Mentors Jim C. Nasby
• 03:51   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Jim C. Nasby
• 04:23   Re: Dead Space Map version 2 Jim C. Nasby
• 04:24   Re: Expanding DELETE/UPDATE returning David Fetter
• 04:27   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Jim C. Nasby
• 04:27   Re: Expanding DELETE/UPDATE returning Jim C. Nasby
• 04:29   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Jim C. Nasby
• 04:31   Re: Expanding DELETE/UPDATE returning Tom Lane
• 04:37   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Tom Lane
• 04:45   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Jim C. Nasby
• 04:46   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Jim C. Nasby
• 04:47   Re: Seeking Google SoC Mentors Tom Lane
• 04:48   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Jim C. Nasby
• 04:54   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Matthew T. O'Connor
• 04:57   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Matthew T. O'Connor
• 05:00   Re: Dead Space Map version 2 Tom Lane
• 05:20   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Tom Lane
• 05:26   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Matthew T. O'Connor
• 05:32   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Simon Riggs
• 05:37   Re: [PATCHES] Load distributed checkpoint Inaam Rana
• 05:46   Re: conversion efforts (Re: SCMS question) Warren Turkal
• 06:10   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Simon Riggs
• 06:51   Re: Dead Space Map version 2 Simon Riggs
• 07:08   Re: [PATCHES] Load distributed checkpoint ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 07:14   Re: Dead Space Map version 2 Simon Riggs
• 07:19   Re: Dead Space Map version 2 Simon Riggs
• 07:39   Re: Dead Space Map version 2 ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 07:56   Re: Dead Space Map version 2 ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 08:22   Re: Seeking Google SoC Mentors Dave Page
• 08:37   Re: Dead Space Map version 2 ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 08:37   Re: Seeking Google SoC Mentors Magnus Hagander
• 08:51   Re: Dead Space Map version 2 Heikki Linnakangas
• 08:54   Re: Seeking Google SoC Mentors Dave Page
• 09:01   Re: Seeking Google SoC Mentors Magnus Hagander
• 09:14   Re: Seeking Google SoC Mentors Dave Page
• 09:57   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Simon Riggs
• 10:03   Re: [PATCHES] Heikki Linnakangas
• 12:34   Re: [PATCHES] HOT WIP Patch - version 3.2 Heikki Linnakangas
• 12:41   Re: Developer TODO List as a PostgreSQL DB Chad Wagner
• 12:45   Re: Compile libpq for pg8.2.3 with vc7 Magnus Hagander
• 12:46   Packed short varlenas, what next? Gregory Stark
• 12:54   Re: Developer TODO List as a PostgreSQL DB Devrim GÜNDÜZ
• 13:01   Re: Developer TODO List as a PostgreSQL DB Andrew Dunstan
• 13:03   Re: Expanding DELETE/UPDATE returning Florian G. Pflug
• 13:07   Re: Proposal for Implenting read-only queries during wal replay (SoC 2007) Florian G. Pflug
• 13:14   Re: Developer TODO List as a PostgreSQL DB Chad Wagner
• 13:15   Re: Packed short varlenas, what next? Peter Eisentraut
• 13:40   Re: Developer TODO List as a PostgreSQL DB Andrew Dunstan
• 13:48   Re: Developer TODO List as a PostgreSQL DB Lukas Kahwe Smith
• 13:49   Re: Developer TODO List as a PostgreSQL DB Michael Glaesemann
• 13:50   Re: Packed short varlenas, what next? Tom Lane
• 14:17   Re: Packed short varlenas, what next? Gregory Stark
• 14:52   Re: Packed short varlenas, what next? Tom Lane
• 15:18   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Jim C. Nasby
• 15:25   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Jim C. Nasby
• 15:30   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Jim C. Nasby
• 15:32   Re: Developer TODO List as a PostgreSQL DB Joshua D. Drake
• 15:38   Re: Resumable vacuum proposal and design overview Jim C. Nasby
• 15:42   7.x horology regression test on Solaris buildfarm machines Tom Lane
• 15:49   Re: Seeking Google SoC Mentors Jim C. Nasby
• 15:52   Re: Resumable vacuum proposal and design overview Simon Riggs
• 15:54   Re: 7.x horology regression test on Solaris buildfarm machines Andrew Dunstan
• 15:58   Re: Dead Space Map version 2 Jim C. Nasby
• 16:03   Re: 7.x horology regression test on Solaris buildfarm machines Kris Jurka
• 16:06   Re: Dead Space Map version 2 Jim C. Nasby
• 16:11   Re: Resumable vacuum proposal and design overview Tom Lane
• 16:12   Re: 7.x horology regression test on Solaris buildfarm machines Kris Jurka
• 16:12   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Matthew T. O'Connor
• 16:16   Re: Resumable vacuum proposal and design overview Matthew T. O'Connor
• 16:16   Re: 7.x horology regression test on Solaris buildfarm machines Tom Lane
• 16:17   bug in gist hstore? Gregory Stark
• 16:17   Re: Seeking Google SoC Mentors Josh Berkus
• 16:22   Re: Seeking Google SoC Mentors Robert Treat
• 16:23   Re: Seeking Google SoC Mentors Andrew Dunstan
• 16:23   Re: Resumable vacuum proposal and design overview Tom Lane
• 16:24   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Jim C. Nasby
• 16:32   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Jim C. Nasby
• 16:32   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Josh Berkus
• 16:35   Re: Packed short varlenas, what next? Josh Berkus
• 16:36   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Tom Lane
• 17:03   Implicit casts with generic arrays Peter Eisentraut
• 17:07   Re: Seeking Google SoC Mentors Martijn van Oosterhout
• 17:13   Re: Packed short varlenas, what next? Tom Lane
• 17:18   Re: Resumable vacuum proposal and design overview Simon Riggs
• 17:21   Re: bug in gist hstore? Gregory Stark
• 17:24   Re: [PATCHES] HOT WIP Patch - version 3.2 Pavan Deolasee
• 17:26   Re: Seeking Google SoC Mentors Peter Eisentraut
• 17:40   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Simon Riggs
• 17:50   Re: Implicit casts with generic arrays Tom Lane
• 18:03   Re: 7.x horology regression test on Solaris buildfarm machines Kris Jurka
• 18:04   Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2 Casey Duncan
• 18:17   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD
• 18:26   Re: conversion efforts (Re: SCMS question) Bruce Momjian
• 18:36   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Jonah H. Harris
• 18:53   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Josh Berkus
• 19:13   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Joshua D. Drake
• 19:32   Re: conversion efforts (Re: SCMS question) Warren Turkal
• 19:33   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Dave Page
• 19:41   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Jordan Henderson
• 19:50   Re: conversion efforts (Re: SCMS question) Andrew Dunstan
• 19:56   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Tom Lane
• 20:01   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Jonah H. Harris
• 20:14   high CPU usage for stats collector in 8.2 Darcy Buskermolen
• 20:37   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Bruce Momjian
• 21:17   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Bruce Momjian
• 21:19   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Bruce Momjian
• 21:29   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Joshua D. Drake
• 21:39   Re: conversion efforts (Re: SCMS question) Warren Turkal
• 21:44   Re: conversion efforts (Re: SCMS question) Joshua D. Drake
• 21:49   Re: [PATCHES] Bruce Momjian
• 21:52   Re: [PATCHES] Joshua D. Drake
• 22:14   Synchronized Scan update Jeff Davis
• 22:48   Re: [PATCHES] Neil Conway
• 22:51   Re: [PATCHES] Bruce Momjian
• 22:52   Re: No ~ operator for box, point Jim C. Nasby
• 22:59   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Jim C. Nasby
• 23:05   Re: No ~ operator for box, point Tom Lane
• 23:17   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Bruce Momjian
• 23:20   Re: [PATCHES] Joshua D. Drake
• 23:21   Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option Jim C. Nasby
• 23:22   Re: conversion efforts (Re: SCMS question) Joshua D. Drake
• 23:56   Re: conversion efforts (Re: SCMS question) Andrew Dunstan