Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gregory Stark
Subject Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option
Date
Msg-id 87slcrp0m6.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option
List pgsql-hackers
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:

>>> On 2/27/07, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I see no reason to implement it if there is no performance gain.

> However, I strongly concur that we need at least some evidence. It could
> easily be that a misstep in the code, causes a loop over the wrong set
> and all the performance we thought we would get is invalid, not because
> of theory or what should happen, but because of actual implementation.

It rather sounds like you're asking for a proof that Simon can write bug-free
code before you allow him to write any code.


--  Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: conversion efforts (Re: SCMS question)
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option