Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option
Date
Msg-id 10498.1172549047@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option  ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option  ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> COMMIT NOWAIT can co-exist with the normal form of COMMIT and does not
> threaten the consistency or robustness of other COMMIT modes. Read that
> again and think about it, before we go further, please.

I read that, and thought about it, and don't think I believe it.  The
problem is that there are more interconnections between different
transactions than you're allowing for.  In particular you need to
justify that the behavior is safe for non-transactional operations like
btree page splits and pg_clog buffer page writes.  The idea that's
particularly bothering me at the moment is that after a system crash,
we might come back up in a state where a NOWAIT transaction appears
committed when its updates didn't all get to disk.  "Database corrupt"
is a situation that threatens all your transactions...

> New commit mode is available by explicit command, or as a default
> setting that will be applied to all COMMITs, or both.

I dislike introducing new nonstandard syntax ("Oracle compatible" is not
standard).  If we did this I'd vote for control via a GUC setting only;
I think that is more useful anyway, as an application can be made to run
with such a setting without invasive source code changes.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Matthew T. O'Connor"
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum next steps, take 2
Next
From: "Jeroen T. Vermeulen"
Date:
Subject: Re: COMMIT NOWAIT Performance Option