Home > mailing lists

Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

1 February 2007

00:30 Re: Very slow queries Chad Wagner
00:32 Re: Slow update Tomas Vondra
13:11 Using statement_timeout as a performance tool? Mark Stosberg
15:42 Subselect query enhancement Michael Artz
16:25 Re: Subselect query enhancement Richard Huxton
16:28 Re: Subselect query enhancement Ted Allen
17:15 Re: Subselect query enhancement Michael Artz
17:25 Re: Subselect query enhancement Frank Wiles
17:27 Re: Subselect query enhancement Michael Artz
18:02 Re: Subselect query enhancement Richard Huxton
18:06 Re: Subselect query enhancement Michael Artz
18:30 Re: int4 vs varchar to store ip addr Michael Artz
21:14 Re: Subselect query enhancement Andrew Lazarus
23:41 drive configuration for a new server Ben

2 February 2007

08:51 Re: Subselect query enhancement Richard Huxton
13:35 trouble with a join on OS X Kirk Wythers
13:41 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Steinar H. Gunderson
13:45 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Richard Huxton
13:50 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Gábriel Ákos
14:47 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Tom Lane
14:59 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Kirk Wythers
15:06 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Kirk Wythers
15:09 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Steinar H. Gunderson
15:12 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Tom Lane
15:53 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Kirk Wythers
16:59 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Tom Lane
17:07 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Kirk Wythers
17:09 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Kirk Wythers
17:16 Re: drive configuration for a new server Jeff Frost
17:49 Re: drive configuration for a new server Ben
18:27 OT: Mac OS X disk buffer cache Kevin Murphy
21:19 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Tom Lane

3 February 2007

00:40 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Luke Lonergan
00:45 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Joshua D. Drake
00:53 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Luke Lonergan
01:02 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Kirk Wythers
01:02 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Joshua D. Drake
01:04 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Kirk Wythers
01:10 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Geoffrey
01:30 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Joshua D. Drake
01:33 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Tom Lane
02:19 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Kirk Wythers
02:22 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Joshua D. Drake
02:31 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Tom Lane
14:59 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Shane Ambler
18:01 optimizing a geo_distance() proximity query Mark Stosberg
18:12 Re: optimizing a geo_distance() proximity query Oleg Bartunov

4 February 2007

04:19 Re: optimizing a geo_distance() proximity query Bruno Wolff III

5 February 2007

03:30 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Kirk Wythers
16:50 Re: trouble with a join on OS X Shane Ambler
18:47 Re: optimizing a geo_distance() proximity query Mark Stosberg
19:15 Re: optimizing a geo_distance() proximity query Merlin Moncure
19:22 Re: optimizing a geo_distance() proximity query Bruno Wolff III
22:01 Re: optimizing a geo_distance() proximity query (example and benchmark) Mark Stosberg

6 February 2007

02:26 Re: Tuning Mischa Sandberg
02:26 index scan through a subquery Bill Howe
02:26 How long should it take to insert 200,000 records? Karen Hill
04:33 Re: How long should it take to insert 200,000 records? Tom Lane
04:40 Re: optimizing a geo_distance() proximity query (example and benchmark) Bruno Wolff III
05:52 Re: index scan through a subquery Tom Lane
08:34 Re: How long should it take to insert 200,000 records? Csaba Nagy
09:21 Re: Tuning Harald Armin Massa
11:58 Re: optimizing a geo_distance() proximity query (example and benchmark) Merlin Moncure
13:40 Re: explain analyze output for review (was: optimizing a geo_distance()...) Mark Stosberg
13:52 Re: explain analyze output for review (was: optimizing a geo_distance()...) Adam Rich
13:55 Re: explain analyze output: vacuuming made a big difference. Mark Stosberg
14:45 Re: explain analyze output for review (was: optimizing a geo_distance()...) Bruno Wolff III
15:15 Re: How long should it take to insert 200,000 records? Scott Marlowe
15:40 Re: How long should it take to insert 200,000 records? Merlin Moncure
15:55 Re: How long should it take to insert 200,000 records? Scott Marlowe
16:03 Re: How long should it take to insert 200,000 records? Merlin Moncure
17:31 Re: How long should it take to insert 200,000 records? Mark Lewis
17:38 Re: How long should it take to insert 200,000 records? Bruno Wolff III
18:06 Re: How long should it take to insert 200,000 records? Merlin Moncure
18:11 Re: How long should it take to insert 200,000 records? Mark Lewis
18:19 Re: index scan through a subquery Bill Howe

7 February 2007

01:11 Re: explain analyze output for review (was: optimizing a geo_distance()...) Hiltibidal, Robert
01:11 Re: explain analyze output for review (was: optimizing a geo_distance()...) Hiltibidal, Robert
01:12 Re: How long should it take to insert 200,000 records? Hiltibidal, Robert
01:12 Re: How long should it take to insert 200,000 records? Karen Hill
01:12 Re: How long should it take to insert 200,000 records? Karen Hill
01:41 Re: How long should it take to insert 200,000 records? Mark Kirkwood
02:07 Re: How long should it take to insert 200,000 records? Tom Lane
13:15 Help Needed Muruganantham M
14:48 Re: Help Needed Richard Huxton
20:31 tip: faster sorting for proximity queries by using cube_distance() Mark Stosberg

8 February 2007

15:48 stats collector process high CPU utilization Benjamin Minshall
16:23 Re: Speed up this query Mark Stosberg
16:24 Re: stats collector process high CPU utilization Tom Lane
16:24 Disk saturation Carlos H. Reimer
16:26 Re: stats collector process high CPU utilization Benjamin Minshall
17:46 Re: stats collector process high CPU utilization Tom Lane
20:16 Re: stats collector process high CPU utilization Benjamin Minshall
20:24 Re: stats collector process high CPU utilization Tom Lane
20:55 Re: stats collector process high CPU utilization Benjamin Minshall
21:08 Re: stats collector process high CPU utilization Tom Lane
21:29 Re: stats collector process high CPU utilization Benjamin Minshall

9 February 2007

01:04 Re: stats collector process high CPU utilization Tom Lane
03:13 Re: stats collector process high CPU utilization minshall@intellicon.biz
03:27 Re: stats collector process high CPU utilization Tom Lane
13:37 Re: stats collector process high CPU utilization Alvaro Herrera
14:08 Re: stats collector process high CPU utilization Tom Lane
14:56 Re: stats collector process high CPU utilization Tom Lane
15:27 Re: stats collector process high CPU utilization Benjamin Minshall
15:33 Re: stats collector process high CPU utilization Tom Lane
17:24 Recreate big table Gábriel Ákos
17:36 Re: stats collector process high CPU utilization Benjamin Minshall
18:10 Re: Recreate big table Daniel Cristian Cruz
18:26 cube operations slower than geo_distance() on production server Mark Stosberg
20:05 Re: Can anyone make this code tighter? Too slow, Please help! Mark Stosberg
23:05 Is there an equivalent for Oracle's user_tables.num_rows Virag Saksena
23:47 Re: Is there an equivalent for Oracle's user_tables.num_rows Tom Lane

10 February 2007

00:08 Re: Is there an equivalent for Oracle's user_tables.num_rows Virag Saksena
00:09 Re: Is there an equivalent for Oracle'suser_tables.num_rows Simon Riggs
00:31 Re: cube operations slower than geo_distance() on production server Merlin Moncure

12 February 2007

15:12 Re: cube operations slower than geo_distance() on production server Mark Stosberg
18:03 Re: cube operations slower than geo_distance() on production server Merlin Moncure
18:06 Re: cube operations slower than geo_distance() on production server Merlin Moncure
18:49 Re: cube operations slower than geo_distance() on production server Mark Stosberg
20:51 limit + order by is slow if no rows in result set Brian Cox
22:26 Re: limit + order by is slow if no rows in result set Heikki Linnakangas
23:26 Re: limit + order by is slow if no rows in result set Brian Cox

13 February 2007

02:36 Re: limit + order by is slow if no rows in result set Tom Lane
08:12 many instances or many databases or many users? ismo.tuononen@solenovo.fi
09:08 Re: many instances or many databases or many users? Heikki Linnakangas
13:15 Re: cube operations slower than geo_distance() on production server Merlin Moncure
13:31 Re: cube operations slower than geo_distance() on production server Merlin Moncure
15:33 Question about Bitmap Heap Scan/BitmapAnd Guillaume Smet
15:49 Re: Question about Bitmap Heap Scan/BitmapAnd Tom Lane
16:09 Proximity query with GIST and row estimation Guillaume Smet
16:17 Re: Question about Bitmap Heap Scan/BitmapAnd Guillaume Smet
16:51 Re: Question about Bitmap Heap Scan/BitmapAnd Tom Lane
17:34 CPU Usage Campbell, Lance
17:49 Re: CPU Usage Alan Hodgson
18:04 JOIN to a VIEW makes a real slow query Chuck D.
18:17 Re: JOIN to a VIEW makes a real slow query Merlin Moncure
19:15 quad or dual core Intel CPUs Kenji Morishige
19:17 Re: JOIN to a VIEW makes a real slow query Chuck D.
19:51 Re: JOIN to a VIEW makes a real slow query Tom Lane
19:54 Re: cube operations slower than geo_distance() on production server Mark Stosberg
20:05 Re: quad or dual core Intel CPUs Arjen van der Meijden
20:29 Re: quad or dual core Intel CPUs Mark Kirkwood
21:40 Re: quad or dual core Intel CPUs Dan Harris
21:49 Re: quad or dual core Intel CPUs Guillaume Smet
21:53 Re: quad or dual core Intel CPUs Heikki Linnakangas

14 February 2007

06:24 Re: cube operations slower than geo_distance() on production server Tom Lane
07:40 An unwanted seqscan Brian Herlihy
07:54 Re: An unwanted seqscan Tom Lane
08:19 Re: quad or dual core Intel CPUs Claus Guttesen
09:00 Benchmarking PGSQL? Krishna Kumar
09:17 Re: Benchmarking PGSQL? Shoaib Mir
12:58 Re: cube operations slower than geo_distance() on production server Merlin Moncure
14:35 Re: Benchmarking PGSQL? Luke Lonergan
15:21 Re: Benchmarking PGSQL? Merlin Moncure
15:28 reindex vs 'analyze' (was: Re: cube operations slower than geo_distance() on production server) Mark Stosberg
16:25 Re: quad or dual core Intel CPUs Kenji Morishige
17:07 Re: reindex vs 'analyze' (was: Re: cube operations slower than geo_distance() on production server) Tom Lane
17:13 Re: Proximity query with GIST and row estimation Guillaume Smet
17:24 Re: Benchmarking PGSQL? Luke Lonergan
17:43 Re: quad or dual core Intel CPUs Claus Guttesen
18:05 Re: reindex vs 'analyze' Mark Stosberg
18:12 Re: JOIN to a VIEW makes a real slow query Chuck D.
21:24 Re: How long should it take to insert 200,000 records? Lou O'Quin
21:32 Re: Proximity query with GIST and row estimation Paul Ramsey
22:40 Re: Benchmarking PGSQL? Josh Berkus

15 February 2007

00:30 Re: An unwanted seqscan Brian Herlihy
12:33 Problem with joining queries. Konstantinos Krikellas
12:39 Re: Benchmarking PGSQL? Merlin Moncure
13:06 Re: Problem with joining queries. Richard Huxton
13:28 Re: Problem with joining queries. Konstantinos Krikellas
13:43 Slow query with 'or' clause philippe
14:44 Re: Slow query with 'or' clause Richard Huxton
15:05 Re: Question about Bitmap Heap Scan/BitmapAnd Guillaume Smet
15:13 Re: Proximity query with GIST and row estimation Guillaume Smet
15:27 Re: Question about Bitmap Heap Scan/BitmapAnd Alvaro Herrera
15:35 Re: Question about Bitmap Heap Scan/BitmapAnd Tom Lane
16:11 Re: Slow query with 'or' clause philippe
16:21 strange issue for certain queries Mike Gargano
17:09 Re: Question about Bitmap Heap Scan/BitmapAnd Guillaume Smet
23:32 Re: Question about Bitmap Heap Scan/BitmapAnd Guillaume Smet

16 February 2007

12:38 Re: Benchmarking PGSQL? Krishna Kumar
12:59 Not Picking Index Gauri Kanekar
13:28 Re: Not Picking Index Michael Fuhr
13:31 Re: Not Picking Index Gauri Kanekar
13:46 Re: Not Picking Index Alvaro Herrera
13:55 Re: Not Picking Index Tom Lane
15:07 Fwd: Not Picking Index Mike Gargano
17:27 Re: Not Picking Index Brad Nicholson
17:31 Re: Proximity query with GIST and row estimation Guillaume Smet
17:33 Re: Not Picking Index Steinar H. Gunderson
17:33 Re: Not Picking Index George Pavlov
18:26 Re: reindex vs 'analyze' Mark Stosberg
18:28 Re: Not Picking Index Tom Lane

19 February 2007

10:00 How to debug performance problems Andreas Tille
16:26 Query Optimization Reinhard Vicinus
17:06 Re: How to debug performance problems Craig A. James
17:18 Re: How to debug performance problems Jeff Davis
17:24 Re: How to debug performance problems Scott Marlowe

20 February 2007

03:54 Re: Query Optimization Tom Lane
06:10 slow subselects Marko Niinimaki
06:21 Re: slow subselects ismo.tuononen@solenovo.fi
06:43 Re: slow subselects Tom Lane
15:45 Re: Query Optimization Jim C. Nasby
22:35 SELECT performance problem Glenn Sullivan
22:41 Re: SELECT performance problem Jeff Frost
22:47 Re: SELECT performance problem Dave Dutcher

21 February 2007

04:34 Re: slow subselects Marko Niinimaki
09:17 Postgres performance Linux vs FreeBSD Jacek Zaręba
14:21 Re: Postgres performance Linux vs FreeBSD Merlin Moncure
14:24 Re: Postgres performance Linux vs FreeBSD Bill Moran
14:45 Re: How to debug performance problems Ray Stell
15:05 Re: How to debug performance problems Craig A. James
15:41 Re: How to debug performance problems Ray Stell
16:50 Re: How to debug performance problems Mark Stosberg
17:03 How to avoid vacuuming a huge logging table Mark Stosberg
17:33 General advice on user functions Dan Harris
17:37 Auto-Vacuum in 8.1 was ineffective for me. 8.2 may work better? Mark Stosberg
17:55 Re: Auto-Vacuum in 8.1 was ineffective for me. 8.2 may work better? Alvaro Herrera
18:06 Re: How to avoid vacuuming a huge logging table Greg Sabino Mullane
18:27 Re: Postgres performance Linux vs FreeBSD Dimitri Fontaine
18:31 Re: General advice on user functions Merlin Moncure
18:32 Re: General advice on user functions Albert Cervera Areny
19:29 Re: Auto-Vacuum in 8.1 was ineffective for me. 8.2 may work better? Mark Stosberg
19:38 Re: Auto-Vacuum in 8.1 was ineffective for me. 8.2 may work better? Matthew T. O'Connor
19:51 Re: Auto-Vacuum in 8.1 was ineffective for me. 8.2 may work better? Alvaro Herrera
20:12 Re: Postgres performance Linux vs FreeBSD Mark Kirkwood
20:41 Re: General advice on user functions Dan Harris
20:55 Re: How to avoid vacuuming a huge logging table Greg Sabino Mullane
21:04 Re: How to avoid vacuuming a huge logging table D'Arcy J.M. Cain

22 February 2007

10:02 Disable result buffering to frontend clients Konstantinos Krikellas
10:12 Re: Disable result buffering to frontend clients Richard Huxton
17:19 slow update on 1M rows (worse with indexes) Gabriel Biberian
17:25 Re: slow update on 1M rows (worse with indexes) Steinar H. Gunderson
17:42 Re: slow update on 1M rows (worse with indexes) Joshua D. Drake
19:20 Vacuum full very slow due to nonremovable dead rows...What makes the dead rows non-removable? Barbara Cosentino
19:30 Re: Vacuum full very slow due to nonremovable dead rows...What makes the dead rows non-removable? Steinar H. Gunderson
20:54 Using the 8.2 autovacuum values with 8.1 Mark Stosberg

23 February 2007

05:18 Re: slow update on 1M rows (worse with indexes) ismo.tuononen@solenovo.fi
08:13 Re: Using the 8.2 autovacuum values with 8.1 Csaba Nagy
09:10 Very slow bytea data extraction msmbarabino@virgilio.it
09:46 Re: Very slow bytea data extraction Richard Huxton
11:20 R: Very slow bytea data extraction msmbarabino@virgilio.it
13:39 Re: R: Very slow bytea data extraction Richard Huxton
15:05 Recommended Initial Settings Campbell, Lance
15:29 Re: Recommended Initial Settings Richard Huxton
15:35 Re: R: Very slow bytea data extraction Merlin Moncure
16:11 Re: Recommended Initial Settings Campbell, Lance
16:20 Re: Recommended Initial Settings Richard Huxton
16:37 Re: Using the 8.2 autovacuum values with 8.1 Jim C. Nasby
16:44 Re: Recommended Initial Settings Jim C. Nasby
16:44 Re: Very slow bytea data extraction msmbarabino@virgilio.it
16:55 Re: Very slow bytea data extraction msmbarabino@virgilio.it
17:11 Re: Recommended Initial Settings Bill Moran
17:14 long checkpoint_timeout Jeff Davis
18:06 which Xeon processors don't have the context switching problem Geoffrey
18:34 Re: which Xeon processors don't have the context switching problem Claus Guttesen
18:39 Re: which Xeon processors don't have the context switching problem Steinar H. Gunderson
18:54 Re: which Xeon processors don't have the context switching problem Alvaro Herrera
19:01 Re: which Xeon processors don't have the context switching problem Steinar H. Gunderson
19:02 Re: long checkpoint_timeout Jim C. Nasby
19:23 Re: long checkpoint_timeout Jeff Davis
20:27 Re: which Xeon processors don't have the context switching problem Josh Berkus
20:33 Re: which Xeon processors don't have the context switching problem Geoffrey
20:33 Re: which Xeon processors don't have the context switching problem Joshua D. Drake
21:18 Re: which Xeon processors don't have the context switching problem Geoffrey
21:23 Re: which Xeon processors don't have the context switching problem Guillaume Smet
21:25 Re: which Xeon processors don't have the context switching problem Guillaume Smet
21:35 Re: long checkpoint_timeout Jim C. Nasby
22:09 Re: pg_trgm performance Guillaume Smet
23:31 Re: pg_trgm performance Steinar H. Gunderson
23:56 Re: which Xeon processors don't have the context switching problem Magnus Hagander

24 February 2007

00:04 Re: pg_trgm performance Guillaume Smet
00:28 Re: which Xeon processors don't have the context switching problem Geoffrey
09:08 Re: pg_trgm performance Steinar H. Gunderson
19:50 Re: which Xeon processors don't have the context switching problem Joshua D. Drake

25 February 2007

02:32 Two hard drives --- what to do with them? Carlos Moreno
02:58 Re: Two hard drives --- what to do with them? Tom Lane
03:36 Re: Two hard drives --- what to do with them? Alexander Staubo
21:11 Re: Two hard drives --- what to do with them? Peter Kovacs

26 February 2007

04:56 invalid page header in block 428 of relation "pg_attribute" ashok@kalculate.com
08:03 Re: Very slow bytea data extraction Richard Huxton
10:49 Query Planner Gauri Kanekar
10:52 Re: Query Planner Steinar H. Gunderson
11:42 Re: pg_trgm performance Guillaume Smet
11:53 Re: pg_trgm performance Oleg Bartunov
11:58 Re: pg_trgm performance Guillaume Smet
12:10 Re: pg_trgm performance Oleg Bartunov
12:22 Server Startup Error Gauri Kanekar
12:27 Re: Server Startup Error Rodrigo Gonzalez
12:28 Re: Server Startup Error Gauri Kanekar
12:32 Re: Server Startup Error Richard Huxton
12:35 Re: Server Startup Error Rodrigo Gonzalez
13:05 Re: Server Startup Error Richard Huxton
14:01 Vacuumdb - Max_FSM_Pages Problem. Pallav Kalva
14:53 Re: Vacuumdb - Max_FSM_Pages Problem. Peter Childs
15:13 does prepareThreshold work? forced to use old driver Gene
15:41 Writting a "search engine" for a pgsql DB Madison Kelly
15:45 Re: [JDBC] does prepareThreshold work? forced to use old driver Kris Jurka
15:52 low memory usage reported by 'top' indicates poor tuning? Mark Stosberg
16:04 Re: Writting a "search engine" for a pgsql DB Joshua D. Drake
16:07 Re: low memory usage reported by 'top' indicates poor tuning? Joshua D. Drake
16:27 Re: low memory usage reported by 'top' indicates poor tuning? Mark Stosberg
16:28 Re: [JDBC] does prepareThreshold work? forced to use old driver Dave Cramer
16:32 Re: Writting a "search engine" for a pgsql DB Mark Stosberg
16:41 Re: Writting a "search engine" for a pgsql DB Joshua D. Drake
16:41 Re: [JDBC] does prepareThreshold work? forced to use old driver Gene
16:48 Re: Writting a "search engine" for a pgsql DB Madison Kelly
16:55 Re: Writting a "search engine" for a pgsql DB Magnus Hagander
17:15 Re: Writting a "search engine" for a pgsql DB Mark Stosberg
18:01 Re: Writting a "search engine" for a pgsql DB Madison Kelly
18:47 Re: Writting a "search engine" for a pgsql DB Mark Stosberg
19:14 Re: Writting a "search engine" for a pgsql DB Jeff Davis
19:33 Re: Vacuumdb - Max_FSM_Pages Problem. Ron
20:31 Re: Writting a "search engine" for a pgsql DB Charles Sprickman
20:51 Re: Two hard drives --- what to do with them? Jeff Davis
23:11 Re: Two hard drives --- what to do with them? Peter Kovacs
23:25 Re: Two hard drives --- what to do with them? Jeff Davis

27 February 2007

04:07 Re: Two hard drives --- what to do with them? Shane Ambler
07:28 Re: Two hard drives --- what to do with them? Peter Kovacs
12:16 Re: Writting a "search engine" for a pgsql DB Magnus Hagander
12:33 Opinions on Raid Joe Uhl
12:34 Re: Writting a "search engine" for a pgsql DB Dave Page
12:55 Re: Opinions on Raid Stefan Kaltenbrunner
14:57 Re: Two hard drives --- what to do with them? Ben
15:06 Re: Opinions on Raid Ron
16:26 Re: Opinions on Raid mark@mark.mielke.cc
16:56 Re: Opinions on Raid Scott Marlowe
16:57 Re: Postgres performance Linux vs FreeBSD Andrew - Supernews
17:26 [kris@obsecurity.org: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems] Jim C. Nasby
17:32 [kris@obsecurity.org: Anyone interested in improving postgresql scaling?] Jim C. Nasby
17:51 Re: Two hard drives --- what to do with them? Shane Ambler
17:55 Re: [kris@obsecurity.org: Anyone interested in improving postgresql scaling?] Tom Lane
18:12 Re: Opinions on Raid Scott Marlowe
18:24 Re: Two hard drives --- what to do with them? Jeff Davis
18:39 Re: Two hard drives --- what to do with them? Scott Marlowe
22:05 Re: Writting a "search engine" for a pgsql DB Chris
22:36 Re: Writting a "search engine" for a pgsql DB Charles Sprickman
22:42 Re: Opinions on Raid Geoff Tolley

28 February 2007

06:44 Re: Writting a "search engine" for a pgsql DB Magnus Hagander
07:33 Re: Writting a "search engine" for a pgsql DB Dave Page
10:17 Re: Writting a "search engine" for a pgsql DB Steinar H. Gunderson
10:40 Re: Writting a "search engine" for a pgsql DB Dave Page
11:35 Re: Writting a "search engine" for a pgsql DB Oleg Bartunov
11:40 Re: Writting a "search engine" for a pgsql DB Dave Page
16:05 Upgraded to 8.2.3 --- still having performance issues Carlos Moreno
16:21 Re: Upgraded to 8.2.3 --- still having performance issues Tom Lane
18:30 Re: Upgraded to 8.2.3 --- still having performance issues Carlos Moreno
19:20 Re: Upgraded to 8.2.3 --- still having performance issues Rodrigo Gonzalez
19:46 Re: Upgraded to 8.2.3 --- still having performance issues Carlos Moreno
20:26 Re: Upgraded to 8.2.3 --- still having performance issues Carlos Moreno