Re: Tuning - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Harald Armin Massa
Subject Re: Tuning
Date
Msg-id 7be3f35d0702060221o46599dc3ua8a6ac6802b94fe0@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Tuning  ("Mischa Sandberg" <mischas@ca.sophos.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Tuners,

allways be aware that results on Windows may be totally different!

My main customer is running PostgreSQL 8.1 on MINIMUM shared buffers

max_connections = 100        #
shared_buffers = 200            # min 16 or max_connections*2, 8KB each

I changed it to this value from the very low default 20000, and the system is responding better; especially after fixing the available memory setting within the planner.

... frustrating part is, I could not replicate this behavious with pg_bench :(

Harald

--
GHUM Harald Massa
persuadere et programmare
Harald Armin Massa
Reinsburgstraße 202b
70197 Stuttgart
0173/9409607
fx 01212-5-13695179
-
Python: the only language with more web frameworks than keywords.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Csaba Nagy
Date:
Subject: Re: How long should it take to insert 200,000 records?
Next
From: "Merlin Moncure"
Date:
Subject: Re: optimizing a geo_distance() proximity query (example and benchmark)