Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

13 April 2020

• 00:19   Re: where should I stick that backup? David Steele
• 00:35   Re: doc review for v13 Justin Pryzby
• 00:57   Re: where should I stick that backup? David Steele
• 01:24   Re: cleaning perl code Andrew Dunstan
• 01:37   Re: where should I stick that backup? Andres Freund
• 01:45   Re: cleaning perl code David Steele
• 02:04   Re: where should I stick that backup? David Steele
• 03:02   Re: where should I stick that backup? Robert Haas
• 03:09   Re: sqlsmith crash incremental sort Tomas Vondra
• 03:27   Re: where should I stick that backup? Stephen Frost
• 03:27   Re: where should I stick that backup? Andres Freund
• 03:41   Re: sqlsmith crash incremental sort Justin Pryzby
• 03:56   Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 Michael Paquier
• 04:18   Re: where should I stick that backup? Stephen Frost
• 05:09   Re: backup manifests Fujii Masao
• 05:20   RE: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup? Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan A&PS Delivery)
• 05:46   Lexer issues Patrick REED
• 05:52   Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 Kyotaro Horiguchi
• 05:58   Re: snapshot too old issues, first around wraparound and then more. Thomas Munro
• 06:25   Re: backup manifests Michael Paquier
• 07:42   Re: pg_stat_statements issue with parallel maintenance (Was Re: WALusage calculation patch) Amit Kapila
• 07:51   Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 Michael Paquier
• 08:14   Re: snapshot too old issues, first around wraparound and then more. Andres Freund
• 08:14   Re: doc review for parallel vacuum Amit Kapila
• 08:18   Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance Yugo NAGATA
• 09:10   Re: WAL usage calculation patch Amit Kapila
• 09:24   Re: Corruption during WAL replay Masahiko Sawada
• 09:31   Re: Race condition in SyncRepGetSyncStandbysPriority Kyotaro Horiguchi
• 09:34   Re: Race condition in SyncRepGetSyncStandbysPriority Kyotaro Horiguchi
• 09:45   Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup? Kyotaro Horiguchi
• 10:40   Re: WAL usage calculation patch Julien Rouhaud
• 10:51   Re: [patch] some PQExpBuffer are not destroyed in pg_dump Masahiko Sawada
• 10:54   Re: pgbench - test whether a variable exists Fabien COELHO
• 11:12   Re: Issues with replication slots(which created manually) againstlogical replication Masahiko Sawada
• 11:27   Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables 曾文旌
• 11:30   Re: doc review for parallel vacuum Justin Pryzby
• 11:37   Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables tushar
• 11:40   Re: Corruption during WAL replay Andres Freund
• 11:49   Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 Kyotaro Horiguchi
• 12:07   Re: weird hash plan cost, starting with pg10 Richard Guo
• 12:24   Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error Amit Kapila
• 12:52   Re: doc review for parallel vacuum Amit Kapila
• 12:53   Re: Corruption during WAL replay Masahiko Sawada
• 13:32   Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables tushar
• 13:44   Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions Kuntal Ghosh
• 13:52   Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error Masahiko Sawada
• 14:46   Re: WAL usage calculation patch Amit Kapila
• 14:50   Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions Dilip Kumar
• 15:25   Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error Amit Kapila
• 15:41   Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions Kuntal Ghosh
• 16:04   Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions Dilip Kumar
• 16:37   Re: WAL usage calculation patch Julien Rouhaud
• 16:53   Re: weird hash plan cost, starting with pg10 Tom Lane
• 16:54   wrong relkind error messages Peter Eisentraut
• 16:59   Re: where should I stick that backup? Bruce Momjian
• 17:20   Re: where should I stick that backup? Robert Haas
• 17:40   Re: execExprInterp() questions / How to improve scalar array op expr eval? James Coleman
• 17:45   Re: spin_delay() for ARM Amit Khandekar
• 17:46   Re: spin_delay() for ARM Amit Khandekar
• 17:56   Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup? Robert Haas
• 18:06   Re: wrong relkind error messages Robert Haas
• 18:13   Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 Robert Haas
• 18:13   Re: wrong relkind error messages Tom Lane
• 18:15   Re: backup manifests Robert Haas
• 18:17   Re: wrong relkind error messages Andrew Dunstan
• 19:47   Re: cleaning perl code Andrew Dunstan
• 20:13   Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane
• 20:34   Re: Properly mark NULL returns in numeric aggregates Jesse Zhang
• 20:37   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Robert Haas
• 20:40   documenting the backup manifest file format Robert Haas
• 20:52   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Erik Rijkers
• 20:55   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Justin Pryzby
• 20:57   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Isaac Morland
• 21:07   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Alvaro Herrera
• 21:08   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Robert Haas
• 21:13   Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions Kuntal Ghosh
• 21:13   Re: Properly mark NULL returns in numeric aggregates Tom Lane
• 21:13   Re: Parallel copy Robert Haas
• 21:27   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane
• 21:28   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Erik Rijkers
• 21:47   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane
• 22:34   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Alvaro Herrera
• 22:51   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Robert Haas
• 23:00   Re: relcache leak warnings vs. errors Andres Freund
• 23:10   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Andrew Dunstan
• 23:14   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Robert Haas
• 23:16   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Robert Haas
• 23:16   Re: Parallel copy Andres Freund
• 23:18   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Robert Haas
• 23:20   Re: Parallel copy Robert Haas
• 23:20   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Andrew Dunstan
• 23:22   Re: relcache leak warnings vs. errors Tom Lane
• 23:29   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane
• 23:31   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? David G. Johnston
• 23:33   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane
• 23:41   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane
• 23:42   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format David Steele
• 23:57   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane