Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

13 April 2020

• 00:02   Re: where should I stick that backup? Robert Haas
• 00:09   Re: sqlsmith crash incremental sort Tomas Vondra
• 00:27   Re: where should I stick that backup? Stephen Frost
• 00:27   Re: where should I stick that backup? Andres Freund
• 00:41   Re: sqlsmith crash incremental sort Justin Pryzby
• 00:56   Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 Michael Paquier
• 01:18   Re: where should I stick that backup? Stephen Frost
• 02:09   Re: backup manifests Fujii Masao
• 02:20   RE: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup? Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan A&PS Delivery)
• 02:46   Lexer issues Patrick REED
• 02:52   Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 Kyotaro Horiguchi
• 02:58   Re: snapshot too old issues, first around wraparound and then more. Thomas Munro
• 03:25   Re: backup manifests Michael Paquier
• 04:42   Re: pg_stat_statements issue with parallel maintenance (Was Re: WALusage calculation patch) Amit Kapila
• 04:51   Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 Michael Paquier
• 05:14   Re: snapshot too old issues, first around wraparound and then more. Andres Freund
• 05:14   Re: doc review for parallel vacuum Amit Kapila
• 05:18   Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance Yugo NAGATA
• 06:10   Re: WAL usage calculation patch Amit Kapila
• 06:24   Re: Corruption during WAL replay Masahiko Sawada
• 06:31   Re: Race condition in SyncRepGetSyncStandbysPriority Kyotaro Horiguchi
• 06:34   Re: Race condition in SyncRepGetSyncStandbysPriority Kyotaro Horiguchi
• 06:45   Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup? Kyotaro Horiguchi
• 07:40   Re: WAL usage calculation patch Julien Rouhaud
• 07:51   Re: [patch] some PQExpBuffer are not destroyed in pg_dump Masahiko Sawada
• 07:54   Re: pgbench - test whether a variable exists Fabien COELHO
• 08:12   Re: Issues with replication slots(which created manually) againstlogical replication Masahiko Sawada
• 08:27   Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables 曾文旌
• 08:30   Re: doc review for parallel vacuum Justin Pryzby
• 08:37   Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables tushar
• 08:40   Re: Corruption during WAL replay Andres Freund
• 08:49   Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 Kyotaro Horiguchi
• 09:07   Re: weird hash plan cost, starting with pg10 Richard Guo
• 09:24   Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error Amit Kapila
• 09:52   Re: doc review for parallel vacuum Amit Kapila
• 09:53   Re: Corruption during WAL replay Masahiko Sawada
• 10:32   Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables tushar
• 10:44   Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions Kuntal Ghosh
• 10:52   Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error Masahiko Sawada
• 11:46   Re: WAL usage calculation patch Amit Kapila
• 11:50   Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions Dilip Kumar
• 12:25   Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error Amit Kapila
• 12:41   Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions Kuntal Ghosh
• 13:04   Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions Dilip Kumar
• 13:37   Re: WAL usage calculation patch Julien Rouhaud
• 13:53   Re: weird hash plan cost, starting with pg10 Tom Lane
• 13:54   wrong relkind error messages Peter Eisentraut
• 13:59   Re: where should I stick that backup? Bruce Momjian
• 14:20   Re: where should I stick that backup? Robert Haas
• 14:40   Re: execExprInterp() questions / How to improve scalar array op expr eval? James Coleman
• 14:45   Re: spin_delay() for ARM Amit Khandekar
• 14:46   Re: spin_delay() for ARM Amit Khandekar
• 14:56   Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup? Robert Haas
• 15:06   Re: wrong relkind error messages Robert Haas
• 15:13   Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 Robert Haas
• 15:13   Re: wrong relkind error messages Tom Lane
• 15:15   Re: backup manifests Robert Haas
• 15:17   Re: wrong relkind error messages Andrew Dunstan
• 16:47   Re: cleaning perl code Andrew Dunstan
• 17:13   Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane
• 17:34   Re: Properly mark NULL returns in numeric aggregates Jesse Zhang
• 17:37   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Robert Haas
• 17:40   documenting the backup manifest file format Robert Haas
• 17:52   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Erik Rijkers
• 17:55   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Justin Pryzby
• 17:57   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Isaac Morland
• 18:07   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Alvaro Herrera
• 18:08   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Robert Haas
• 18:13   Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions Kuntal Ghosh
• 18:13   Re: Properly mark NULL returns in numeric aggregates Tom Lane
• 18:13   Re: Parallel copy Robert Haas
• 18:27   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane
• 18:28   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Erik Rijkers
• 18:47   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane
• 19:34   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Alvaro Herrera
• 19:51   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Robert Haas
• 20:00   Re: relcache leak warnings vs. errors Andres Freund
• 20:10   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Andrew Dunstan
• 20:14   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Robert Haas
• 20:16   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Robert Haas
• 20:16   Re: Parallel copy Andres Freund
• 20:18   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Robert Haas
• 20:20   Re: Parallel copy Robert Haas
• 20:20   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Andrew Dunstan
• 20:22   Re: relcache leak warnings vs. errors Tom Lane
• 20:29   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane
• 20:31   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? David G. Johnston
• 20:33   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane
• 20:41   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane
• 20:42   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format David Steele
• 20:57   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane
• 21:20   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? David G. Johnston
• 21:24   Re: doc review for parallel vacuum Justin Pryzby
• 21:26   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? David G. Johnston
• 21:42   Re: documenting the backup manifest file format Alvaro Herrera
• 22:26   Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 Michael Paquier
• 22:33   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Jonathan S. Katz
• 22:38   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Corey Huinker
• 22:44   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane
• 22:48   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Corey Huinker
• 22:51   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane
• 23:02   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Jonathan S. Katz
• 23:04   Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 Alvaro Herrera
• 23:38   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Jonathan S. Katz
• 23:48   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane
• 23:50   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Alvaro Herrera
• 23:55   Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? Tom Lane
• 23:55   Re: pg_basebackup, manifests and backends older than ~12 Robert Haas