On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 7:05 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
>
>
> No problem. I think I was trying to make my text similar to that from
> 14a4f6f37.
>
> I realized that I didn't sq!uash my last patch, so it didn't include the
> functional change (which is maybe what Robert was referring to).
>
I think it is better to add a new test for temporary table which has
less data. We don't want to increase test timings to test the
combination of options. I changed that in the attached patch. I will
commit this tomorrow unless you or anyone else has any more comments.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
