Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Erik Rijkers
Subject Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Date
Msg-id 8337094ada1541802435f5bb185b5c78@xs4all.nl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2020-04-13 19:13, Tom Lane wrote:
> As discussed in the thread at [1], I've been working on redesigning
> the tables we use to present SQL functions and operators.  The
> first installment of that is now up; see tables 9.30 and 9.31 at
> 
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/functions-datetime.html
> 
> and table 9.33 at
> 
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/functions-enum.html
> 
> Before I spend more time on this, I want to make sure that people
> are happy with this line of attack.  Comparing these tables to
> the way they look in v12, they clearly take more vertical space;
> but at least to my eye they're less cluttered and more readable.
> They definitely scale a lot better for cases where a long function
> description is needed, or where we'd like to have more than one
> example.  Does anyone prefer the old way, or have a better idea?
> 

+1

In the pdf it is a big improvement; and the html is better too.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: documenting the backup manifest file format
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: documenting the backup manifest file format