Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

4 August 2016

• 00:00   Re: Implementing full UTF-8 support (aka supporting 0x00) Thomas Munro
• 00:13   Re: Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation) Peter Geoghegan
• 00:34   Re: Cache Hash Index meta page. Jeff Janes
• 00:39   Re: [sqlsmith] FailedAssertion("!(k == indices_count)", File: "tsvector_op.c", Line: 511) Tom Lane
• 00:52   Re: [sqlsmith] FailedAssertion("!(k == indices_count)", File: "tsvector_op.c", Line: 511) Tom Lane
• 00:53   Re: [sqlsmith] FailedAssertion("!(k == indices_count)", File: "tsvector_op.c", Line: 511) Thomas Munro
• 00:57   Re: Increasing timeout of poll_query_until for TAP tests Michael Paquier
• 01:06   Re: Cache Hash Index meta page. Tom Lane
• 01:31   Re: Implementing full UTF-8 support (aka supporting 0x00) Álvaro Hernández Tortosa
• 01:32   Re: Small fix: avoid passing null pointers to memcpy() Peter Eisentraut
• 02:28   Re: Lossy Index Tuple Enhancement (LITE) Bruce Momjian
• 02:35   Re: Slowness of extended protocol Bruce Momjian
• 02:54   Re: regression test for extended query protocol Michael Paquier
• 02:56   Re: Lossy Index Tuple Enhancement (LITE) Bruce Momjian
• 03:08   Re: Possible duplicate release of buffer lock. Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
• 03:16   Re: Lossy Index Tuple Enhancement (LITE) Simon Riggs
• 03:22   Re: Implementing full UTF-8 support (aka supporting 0x00) Craig Ringer
• 03:24   Re: PostgreSQL 10 kick-off Michael Paquier
• 03:26   Re: Way to access LSN (for each transaction) by directly talking to postgres? Craig Ringer
• 03:33   Re: Lossy Index Tuple Enhancement (LITE) Bruce Momjian
• 03:34   Re: Lossy Index Tuple Enhancement (LITE) Bruce Momjian
• 03:37   Re: Way to access LSN (for each transaction) by directly talking to postgres? Michael Paquier
• 03:40   Re: Implementing full UTF-8 support (aka supporting 0x00) Bruce Momjian
• 04:13   Re: Lossy Index Tuple Enhancement (LITE) Bruce Momjian
• 04:25   Re: Lossy Index Tuple Enhancement (LITE) Claudio Freire
• 06:22   Re: Changed SRF in targetlist handling Andres Freund
• 07:14   Re: [sqlsmith] FailedAssertion("!(k == indices_count)", File: "tsvector_op.c", Line: 511) Noah Misch
• 07:26   Re: New version numbering practices Craig Ringer
• 07:29   Re: max_parallel_degree > 0 for 9.6 beta Noah Misch
• 07:41   Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. Masahiko Sawada
• 07:45   Re: New version numbering practices Tom Lane
• 07:56   Re: max_parallel_degree > 0 for 9.6 beta Tom Lane
• 07:58   Optimization for lazy_scan_heap Masahiko Sawada
• 08:26   Re: Tracking wait event for latches Michael Paquier
• 09:32   Re: handling unconvertible error messages Victor Wagner
• 09:45   Re: handling unconvertible error messages Victor Wagner
• 10:03   Re: [sqlsmith] FailedAssertion("!(XLogCtl->Insert.exclusiveBackup)", File: "xlog.c", Line: 10200) Michael Paquier
• 10:25   Re: Reviewing freeze map code Andres Freund
• 10:38   Re: [sqlsmith] FailedAssertion("!(XLogCtl->Insert.exclusiveBackup)", File: "xlog.c", Line: 10200) Michael Paquier
• 10:42   [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off Tsunakawa, Takayuki
• 10:42   Re: New version numbering practices Craig Ringer
• 10:48   Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off Michael Paquier
• 10:49   Re: Oddity in EXPLAIN for foreign/custom join pushdown plans Etsuro Fujita
• 10:52   Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off Andres Freund
• 10:56   Re: Leaking memory in text_overlay function Anastasia Lubennikova
• 12:00   Re: Why we lost Uber as a user Torsten Zuehlsdorff
• 12:04   Re: Oddity in EXPLAIN for foreign/custom join pushdown plans Kouhei Kaigai
• 13:16   Re: Oddity in EXPLAIN for foreign/custom join pushdown plans Etsuro Fujita
• 13:59   Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft Pavan Deolasee
• 14:28   Unused argument in PinBuffer function Ildar Musin
• 14:45   Bug in WaitForBackgroundWorkerShutdown() [REL9_5_STABLE] Dmitry Ivanov
• 14:49   Re: Bug in WaitForBackgroundWorkerShutdown() [REL9_5_STABLE] Dmitry Ivanov
• 15:08   Re: Bug in WaitForBackgroundWorkerShutdown()[REL9_5_STABLE] Yury Zhuravlev
• 15:15   Re: [Patch] Temporary tables that do not bloat pg_catalog (a.k.a fast temp tables) Aleksander Alekseev
• 15:44   Re: [Patch] Temporary tables that do not bloat pg_catalog (a.k.a fast temp tables) Geoff Winkless
• 16:25   Re: max_parallel_degree > 0 for 9.6 beta Robert Haas
• 16:37   Re: Surprising behaviour of \set AUTOCOMMIT ON Amit Kapila
• 16:42   Re: handling unconvertible error messages Tom Lane
• 16:45   Re: New version numbering practices Tom Lane
• 16:48   Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off Tom Lane
• 16:52   Re: max_parallel_degree > 0 for 9.6 beta David G. Johnston
• 16:53   Re: New version numbering practices Vladimir Sitnikov
• 16:54   "Some tests to cover hash_index" Mithun Cy
• 16:57   Re: New version numbering practices Tom Lane
• 17:16   Re: Surprising behaviour of \set AUTOCOMMIT ON Pavel Stehule
• 17:33   Re: Hash Indexes Mithun Cy
• 17:39   Re: New version numbering practices Vladimir Sitnikov
• 18:05   Re: handling unconvertible error messages Victor Wagner
• 18:21   Re: regression test for extended query protocol Alvaro Herrera
• 18:57   improved DefElem list processing Peter Eisentraut
• 19:29   Re: Design for In-Core Logical Replication Simon Riggs
• 19:31   Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft Andres Freund
• 19:53   Re: Why we lost Uber as a user Alfred Perlstein
• 19:55   Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft Bruce Momjian
• 19:58   Re: Lossy Index Tuple Enhancement (LITE) Simon Riggs
• 19:58   Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft Andres Freund
• 20:03   Re: Lossy Index Tuple Enhancement (LITE) Simon Riggs
• 20:05   Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft Bruce Momjian
• 20:11   Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft Simon Riggs
• 20:12   Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft Bruce Momjian
• 20:14   Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft Claudio Freire
• 20:16   Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft Simon Riggs
• 20:16   Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft Bruce Momjian
• 20:17   Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft Andres Freund
• 20:18   Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft Simon Riggs
• 20:20   Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft Bruce Momjian
• 20:21   Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft Bruce Momjian
• 20:23   Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft Andres Freund
• 20:27   Re: Lossy Index Tuple Enhancement (LITE) Bruce Momjian
• 20:28   Re: Lossy Index Tuple Enhancement (LITE) Claudio Freire
• 20:28   Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft Pavan Deolasee
• 20:35   Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft Pavan Deolasee
• 20:35   Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft Claudio Freire
• 20:42   psql: Missing option to print current buffer to current output channel (i.e., \qprint) David G. Johnston
• 20:49   Pgbench performance tuning? Greg Stark
• 20:49   Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft Bruce Momjian
• 20:53   Re: Pgbench performance tuning? Andres Freund
• 20:54   Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft Bruce Momjian
• 21:07   Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off Robert Haas
• 21:07   Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft Bruce Momjian
• 21:09   Re: improved DefElem list processing Tom Lane
• 21:09   Re: Double invocation of InitPostmasterChild in bgworker with -DEXEC_BACKEND Robert Haas
• 21:19   Re: Lossy Index Tuple Enhancement (LITE) Simon Riggs
• 21:20   Re: Pgbench performance tuning? Andres Freund
• 21:21   Re: improved DefElem list processing Tom Lane
• 21:23   Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft Claudio Freire
• 21:26   Re: handling unconvertible error messages Tom Lane
• 21:33   Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft Claudio Freire
• 21:49   Re: Pgbench performance tuning? Greg Stark
• 22:18   Re: New version numbering practices Peter Eisentraut
• 23:12   Re: New version numbering practices Robert Haas
• 23:17   Re: Keeping CURRENT_DATE and similar constructs in original format Peter Eisentraut
• 23:19   Re: Bug in WaitForBackgroundWorkerShutdown()[REL9_5_STABLE] Tom Lane
• 23:32   Re: New version numbering practices Tom Lane
• 23:33   Re: Fwd: [BUGS] BUG #14247: COMMENT is restored on wrong database Robert Haas
• 23:34   Re: [Patch] RBTree iteration interface improvement Robert Haas
• 23:34   Re: New version numbering practices Tom Lane
• 23:50   Re: Fwd: [BUGS] BUG #14247: COMMENT is restored on wrong database Tom Lane