Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 August 2016

• 00:26   Re: Slowness of extended protocol Greg Stark
• 00:34   Re: Slowness of extended protocol Andres Freund
• 00:57   Re: Slowness of extended protocol Tom Lane
• 03:52   Re: Combining hash values Thomas Munro
• 07:07   Re: Broken order-of-operations in parallel query latch manipulation Amit Kapila
• 08:15   Re: asynchronous and vectorized execution Amit Khandekar
• 09:09   Re: System load consideration before spawning parallel workers Haribabu Kommi
• 09:17   Re: System load consideration before spawning parallel workers Gavin Flower
• 09:41   Re: Syntax of xmltable function Pavel Stehule
• 10:19   Re: Combining hash values Greg Stark
• 10:32   Re: Slowness of extended protocol Shay Rojansky
• 11:23   Re: Changed SRF in targetlist handling Andres Freund
• 11:39   Re: pg_basebackup wish list Fujii Masao
• 12:23   Re: Slowness of extended protocol Vladimir Sitnikov
• 12:45   Re: [Patch] Temporary tables that do not bloat pg_catalog (a.k.a fast temp tables) Aleksander Alekseev
• 14:19   Re: Oddity in EXPLAIN for foreign/custom join pushdown plans Etsuro Fujita
• 14:24   Re: Combining hash values Dean Rasheed
• 14:30   Re: Oddity in EXPLAIN for foreign/custom join pushdown plans Etsuro Fujita
• 14:31   Re: Oddity in EXPLAIN for foreign/custom join pushdown plans Ashutosh Bapat
• 14:35   pg_size_pretty, SHOW, and spaces Christoph Berg
• 14:59   Re: Oddity in EXPLAIN for foreign/custom join pushdown plans Etsuro Fujita
• 15:12   Re: Slowness of extended protocol Vladimir Sitnikov
• 15:21   Confusing docs about GetForeignUpperPaths in fdwhandler.sgml Etsuro Fujita
• 16:09   Re: [Patch] Temporary tables that do not bloat pg_catalog (a.k.a fast temp tables) Tomas Vondra
• 16:11   Re: Why we lost Uber as a user Hannu Krosing
• 16:25   Re: Oddity in EXPLAIN for foreign/custom join pushdown plans Kouhei Kaigai
• 16:29   Re: Why we lost Uber as a user Stephen Frost
• 17:00   Re: Why we lost Uber as a user Tom Lane
• 17:07   Re: No longer possible to query catalogs for index capabilities? Stephen Frost
• 17:19   Re: No longer possible to query catalogs for index capabilities? Tom Lane
• 17:35   Re: No longer possible to query catalogs for index capabilities? Stephen Frost
• 17:35   Re: No longer possible to query catalogs for index capabilities? David G. Johnston
• 18:03   Re: [PATCH v12] GSSAPI encryption support Stephen Frost
• 18:15   Re: Broken order-of-operations in parallel query latch manipulation Tom Lane
• 18:22   Re: Combining hash values Tom Lane
• 18:25   PostgreSQL 10 kick-off Peter Eisentraut
• 18:27   Re: Combining hash values Tom Lane
• 18:49   New version numbering practices Tom Lane
• 18:54   Re: PostgreSQL 10 kick-off Simon Riggs
• 19:19   Re: PostgreSQL 10 kick-off Simon Riggs
• 19:25   Re: pg_size_pretty, SHOW, and spaces Bruce Momjian
• 19:38   Re: PoC: Make it possible to disallow WHERE-less UPDATE and DELETE Bruce Momjian
• 20:07   Re: pg_replication_origin_xact_reset() and its argument variables Robert Haas
• 20:08   Re: PostgreSQL 10 kick-off Fabrízio de Royes Mello
• 20:08   Re: MSVC pl-perl error message is not verbose enough Robert Haas
• 20:16   Re: Constraint merge and not valid status Robert Haas
• 20:19   Re: New version numbering practices David Fetter
• 20:19   TODO item: Implement Boyer-Moore searching in LIKE queries Karan Sikka
• 20:21   Re: PostgreSQL 10 kick-off Tom Lane
• 20:24   Re: [Patch] Temporary tables that do not bloat pg_catalog (a.k.a fast temp tables) Tom Lane
• 20:25   Re: Any need of GRANT/REVOKE CREATE TABLE | POLICY | ETC Robert Haas
• 20:27   Re: New version numbering practices Alvaro Herrera
• 20:32   Re: Constraint merge and not valid status Tom Lane
• 20:41   Re: New version numbering practices Tom Lane
• 20:47   Re: pg_replication_origin_xact_reset() and its argument variables Andres Freund
• 20:48   Re: pg_replication_origin_xact_reset() and its argument variables Andres Freund
• 20:59   Re: New version numbering practices David G. Johnston
• 21:00   Re: pg_replication_origin_xact_reset() and its argument variables Fujii Masao
• 21:02   Re: New version numbering practices Tom Lane
• 21:08   HandleParallelMessages contains CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS? Tom Lane
• 21:20   Re: pg_basebackup wish list Jeff Janes
• 21:49   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14244: wrong suffix for pg_size_pretty() Peter Eisentraut
• 21:51   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14244: wrong suffix for pg_size_pretty() Peter Eisentraut
• 21:52   Re: New version numbering practices Stephen Frost
• 21:52   Re: [BUGS] BUG #14244: wrong suffix for pg_size_pretty() Bruce Momjian
• 21:53   Re: pg_size_pretty, SHOW, and spaces Peter Eisentraut
• 22:03   Re: New version numbering practices David Fetter
• 22:27   Re: New version numbering practices Stephen Frost
• 23:00   Re: New version numbering practices Andrew Dunstan
• 23:18   PostmasterContext survives into parallel workers!? Tom Lane
• 23:21   Re: HandleParallelMessages contains CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS? Alvaro Herrera
• 23:25   Re: New version numbering practices Tom Lane
• 23:37   Re: HandleParallelMessages contains CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS? Tom Lane