Re: New version numbering practices - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: New version numbering practices
Date
Msg-id 14378.1470083104@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New version numbering practices  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: New version numbering practices  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Re: New version numbering practices  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Somewhat related is how we name the git branches. It would help me from 
> a buildfarm POV if we kept lexically them sortable, which could be done 
> at least for the next 90 major releases :-) by adding an underscore 
> after the REL piece, thus: REL_10_STABLE. I realise that's a way off, 
> but it's worth bringing up while we're discussing the topic.

Hmm, sounds a bit C-locale-centric, but I have no objection to inserting
an underscore there if it seems helpful.

What I thought would be worth discussing is whether to continue using the
"_STABLE" suffix.  It seems rather like a noise word for our purposes.
OTOH, dropping it might be a headache for scripts that deal with branch
names --- any thoughts?
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: HandleParallelMessages contains CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: HandleParallelMessages contains CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS?