Re: New version numbering practices - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: New version numbering practices
Date
Msg-id 14833.1470074538@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New version numbering practices  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: New version numbering practices  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes:
> I suspect I'll end up using 10.x somewhat frequently though I'm mostly on
> the lists.  I suspect the choice will be dependent on context and channel.

Hmm, that seems like a workable answer as well, and one that's traceable
to our past habits.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_replication_origin_xact_reset() and its argument variables
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: HandleParallelMessages contains CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS?