Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft
Date
Msg-id 20160804175404.GS1702@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug  4, 2016 at 01:05:53PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Approach 2 seems more reasonable and simple. 
> > 
> > There are only 2 bits for lp_flags and all combinations are already used. But
> > for LP_REDIRECT root line pointer, we could use the lp_len field to store this
> > special flag, which is not used for LP_REDIRECT line pointers. So we are able
> > to mark the root line pointer.
> 
> Uh, as I understand it, we only use LP_REDIRECT when we have _removed_
> the tuple that the ctid was pointing to, but it seems you would need to
> set HEAP_RECHECK_REQUIRED earlier than that.
> 
> Also, what is currently in the lp_len field for LP_REDIRECT?  Zeros, or
> random data?  I am asking for pg_upgrade purposes.

It seems LP_REDIRECT's lp_len is always zero:  :-)
/* * ItemIdSetRedirect *      Set the item identifier to be REDIRECT, with the specified link. *      Beware of
multipleevaluations of itemId! */#define ItemIdSetRedirect(itemId, link) \( \    (itemId)->lp_flags = LP_REDIRECT, \
(itemId)->lp_off= (link), \    (itemId)->lp_len = 0 \              ^^^^^^^^^^)
 

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com

+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+                     Ancient Roman grave inscription +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Pgbench performance tuning?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] Change the default of update_process_title to off