Re: improved DefElem list processing - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: improved DefElem list processing
Date
Msg-id 8840.1470334861@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: improved DefElem list processing  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: improved DefElem list processing  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> The other adds a location field to the DefElem node.

> +1 for sure, lots of places where that would be a good thing
> (the duplicate check itself, for starters).

Forgot to mention: seems like you should have added a location
argument to makeDefElem.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Pgbench performance tuning?
Next
From: Claudio Freire
Date:
Subject: Re: Heap WARM Tuples - Design Draft