Re: New version numbering practices - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Vladimir Sitnikov
Subject Re: New version numbering practices
Date
Msg-id CAB=Je-FGek7Ez9izkexQAo1wuiknfEGOcTE7aOq38nym7Cs5TA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: New version numbering practices  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: New version numbering practices  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Sorry, but I don't buy that.  I think sending both server_version and
server_version_num would be silly, and we're certainly not going to stop
sending server_version.

What is wrong with sending machine-readable value?

Vladimir

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: max_parallel_degree > 0 for 9.6 beta
Next
From: Mithun Cy
Date:
Subject: "Some tests to cover hash_index"