Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

23 June 2006

• 00:04   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Tom Lane
• 00:20   Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Tom Lane
• 00:40   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Andrew Dunstan
• 00:47   Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems Michael Glaesemann
• 00:49   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Tom Lane
• 00:53   Re: Interval aggregate regression failure (expected seems Michael Glaesemann
• 01:20   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Thomas Lockhart
• 01:38   Re: Going for "all green" buildfarm results Tom Lane
• 01:47   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 01:49   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Tom Lane
• 01:52   Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Mark Kirkwood
• 01:56   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Agent M
• 02:09   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Steve Atkins
• 02:30   Small overhead run time memory trace (Was Re: shall we have a TRACE_MEMORY mode) Qingqing Zhou
• 02:30   Row comparison for tables (was Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC) Tom Lane
• 02:30   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Gavin Sherry
• 03:06   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Christopher Browne
• 03:20   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jonah H. Harris
• 03:34   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Gavin Sherry
• 03:37   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Alvaro Herrera
• 03:51   Full Disjunction Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 05:44   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Heikki Linnakangas
• 06:12   Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted on Bruce Momjian
• 07:10   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Dave Page
• 07:29   Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted on Windows?) Dave Page
• 08:02   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Magnus Hagander
• 08:45   Shared library conflicts Thomas Hallgren
• 08:52   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Michael Meskes
• 09:02   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Csaba Nagy
• 09:14   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC PFC
• 09:31   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Csaba Nagy
• 09:38   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Luke Lonergan
• 10:10   Re: Shared library conflicts William ZHANG
• 10:19   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward
• 10:36   Re: Shared library conflicts Martijn van Oosterhout
• 11:01   Re: Shared library conflicts Thomas Hallgren
• 11:40   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward
• 11:46   Re: xlog viewer proposal Simon Riggs
• 12:00   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Csaba Nagy
• 12:26   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Andrew Dunstan
• 12:41   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
• 12:43   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward
• 12:56   Planning without reason. Tzahi Fadida
• 13:01   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Csaba Nagy
• 13:15   Re: Planning without reason. Martijn van Oosterhout
• 13:24   Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Alvaro Herrera
• 13:30   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Csaba Nagy
• 13:35   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Hannu Krosing
• 13:56   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions John DeSoi
• 13:57   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Martijn van Oosterhout
• 13:58   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Tom Lane
• 13:59   Re: xlog viewer proposal Diogo Biazus
• 14:00   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Alvaro Herrera
• 14:04   Re: xlog viewer proposal Diogo Biazus
• 14:04   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jonah H. Harris
• 14:11   Re: Full Disjunction Jonah H. Harris
• 14:11   Re: Planning without reason. Tzahi Fadida
• 14:12   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward
• 14:14   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Dave Page
• 14:14   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Tom Lane
• 14:20   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Dave Page
• 14:21   Re: xlog viewer proposal Simon Riggs
• 14:24   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Alvaro Herrera
• 14:25   Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions) Tom Lane
• 14:25   Re: xlog viewer proposal Simon Riggs
• 14:30   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC A.M.
• 14:30   Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions) Larry Rosenman
• 14:33   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward
• 14:34   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Csaba Nagy
• 14:47   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD
• 14:47   Re: Planning without reason. Martijn van Oosterhout
• 14:50   Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions Michael Meskes
• 14:53   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Hannu Krosing
• 14:56   Webcluster session storage, was vacuum, performance, and MVCC James Robinson
• 15:06   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Csaba Nagy
• 15:10   Re: Planning without reason. Tzahi Fadida
• 15:13   Re: Webcluster session storage, was vacuum, performance, and MVCC Martijn van Oosterhout
• 15:25   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC mark@mark.mielke.cc
• 15:26   Re: Planning without reason. Martijn van Oosterhout
• 15:40   Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL Andrew Dunstan
• 15:45   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Hannu Krosing
• 16:07   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Csaba Nagy
• 16:28   Re: Planning without reason. Tom Lane
• 16:32   Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2 Tom Lane
• 16:48   Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions) Tom Lane
• 16:53   Re: checking on buildfarm member thrush Gaetano Mendola
• 17:09   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Tom Lane
• 17:13   Re: Planning without reason. Tzahi Fadida
• 18:12   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward
• 18:20   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC David Fetter
• 18:28   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jonah H. Harris
• 18:30   Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL Andrew Dunstan
• 18:31   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jochem van Dieten
• 18:41   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian
• 18:43   Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL Adrian Maier
• 18:49   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Florian Weimer
• 18:53   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward
• 19:01   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Tom Lane
• 19:08   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian
• 19:09   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Hannu Krosing
• 19:12   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jonah H. Harris
• 19:13   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Mark Woodward
• 19:32   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jonah H. Harris
• 19:36   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Stefan Kaltenbrunner
• 19:46   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Jonah H. Harris
• 21:02   Re: Planning without reason. Greg Stark
• 21:13   Re: Planning without reason. Martijn van Oosterhout
• 21:27   Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC Bruce Momjian
• 22:48   Buffers to Nest Loop Join and him pages Daniel Xavier de Sousa
• 23:17   Re: [GENERAL] Out of memory error in 8.1.0 Win32 Tom Lane