Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions
Date
Msg-id E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E401388B0D@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions  (John DeSoi <desoi@pgedit.com>)
Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of
> Andrew Dunstan
> Sent: 22 June 2006 23:09
> To: Tom Lane
> Cc: Bort, Paul; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions
>
>
>
> Something has broken Cygwin in the last 18 days ;-(

Is there any real reason to continue to support Cygwin? We've always
said it's not a first class port, and now we have the native port which
is it seems somewhat pointless expending further effort on it.

Regards, Dave.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted on
Next
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: postmaster.exe vs postgres.exe (was: CVS HEAD busted on Windows?)