Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Anyway, the lack of daily Cygwin builds is not permanent.
> There are several supported platforms not represented on the buildfarm -
> e.g. the one HPUX member has never actually reported any results.
Yeah, and this is not a good thing. Eventually I'd like to get to a
point where every platform we consider "supported" has regular buildfarm
reports. No more calls for port reports during beta periods --- beta
work should focus on functionality testing, not getting it to build.
regards, tom lane