Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL Source and Copyright Questions)
Date
Msg-id 16545.1151081280@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Anyway, the lack of daily Cygwin builds is not permanent.

> There are several supported platforms not represented on the buildfarm - 
> e.g. the one HPUX member has never actually reported any results.

Yeah, and this is not a good thing.  Eventually I'd like to get to a
point where every platform we consider "supported" has regular buildfarm
reports.  No more calls for port reports during beta periods --- beta
work should focus on functionality testing, not getting it to build.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Overhead for stats_command_string et al, take 2
Next
From: Gaetano Mendola
Date:
Subject: Re: checking on buildfarm member thrush