On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 10:59 -0300, Diogo Biazus wrote:
> On 6/23/06, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > - give more flexibility for managing the xlogs remotely
>
> Not sure what you mean.
>
> > - I think it's faster to implement and to have a working and
> usable
> > tool.
>
> Why do you think that? It sounds like you've got more work
> since you
> effectively need to rewrite the _desc routines.
>
> Yes, but I don't need to worry with program output, and I have the
> backend's memory management and error handling.
I'd suggest doing a quick prototype to allow us to evaluate which
architecture would be preferable.
I'm torn between the good-idea and the safe-minimal-but-definitely in
8.2 option.
-- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
