On Fri, 2006-06-23 at 10:59 -0300, Diogo Biazus wrote:
> On 6/23/06, Simon Riggs < simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > - give more flexibility for managing the xlogs remotely > > Not sure what you mean. > > > - I think it's faster to implement and to have a working and > usable > > tool. > > Why do you think that? It sounds like you've got more work > since you > effectively need to rewrite the _desc routines. > > Yes, but I don't need to worry with program output, and I have the > backend's memory management and error handling.
I'd suggest doing a quick prototype to allow us to evaluate which architecture would be preferable.
I'm torn between the good-idea and the safe-minimal-but-definitely in 8.2 option.
