Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

25 February 2005

• 00:01   Re: psql: recall previous command? Thomas F.O'Connell
• 00:27   Re: Some download statistics Ernst Herzberg
• 00:33   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question Magnus Hagander
• 00:34   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question Magnus Hagander
• 00:35   Re: Some download statistics Magnus Hagander
• 00:47   Re: Some download statistics Dave Page
• 00:50   Re: [JDBC] Where are we on stored procedures? Francisco Figueiredo Jr.
• 01:10   Re: [NOVICE] Question on TRUNCATE privleges Bruce Momjian
• 01:15   Re: [NOVICE] Question on TRUNCATE privleges Tom Lane
• 01:17   Re: Some download statistics Tom Lane
• 01:21   Re: [NOVICE] Question on TRUNCATE privleges Bruce Momjian
• 01:27   Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c Bruce Momjian
• 01:29   Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c Bruce Momjian
• 01:32   Re: [JDBC] Where are we on stored procedures? Tom Lane
• 01:38   Re: Some download statistics Marc G. Fournier
• 01:40   Re: Some download statistics Marc G. Fournier
• 01:47   Re: [NOVICE] Question on TRUNCATE privleges Tom Lane
• 02:04   Re: psql: recall previous command? Neil Conway
• 02:23   Re: Where are we on stored procedures? Gavin Sherry
• 02:46   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Bruce Momjian
• 02:56   Re: psql: recall previous command? Bruce Momjian
• 03:02   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 John Hansen
• 03:12   Re: psql: recall previous command? Neil Conway
• 03:24   Re: psql: recall previous command? Bruce Momjian
• 03:27   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Tom Lane
• 03:29   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 John Hansen
• 03:45   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 John Hansen
• 04:11   Re: Finding if old transactions are running... Bruce Momjian
• 04:33   Re: Where are we on stored procedures? Tom Lane
• 06:06   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c Bruce Momjian
• 06:18   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c Tom Lane
• 06:22   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c Bruce Momjian
• 07:00   Interesting NetBSD annual report Bruce Momjian
• 07:51   Re: UTF8 or Unicode Bruce Momjian
• 07:59   Re: Can we remove SnapshotSelf? Bruce Momjian
• 08:07   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question Greg Stark
• 08:18   Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Bruce Momjian
• 09:20   Re: Finding if old transactions are running... jtv@xs4all.nl
• 09:31   Re: Finding if old transactions are running... Tom Lane
• 09:47   Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Marc G. Fournier
• 09:49   Re: Where are we on stored procedures? Neil Conway
• 10:02   Re: UTF8 or Unicode Peter Eisentraut
• 10:06   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Peter Eisentraut
• 10:08   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Peter Eisentraut
• 10:21   Re: Finding if old transactions are running... jtv@xs4all.nl
• 11:31   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 John Hansen
• 11:35   idea for concurrent seqscans Jeff Davis
• 11:57   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD
• 11:57   Re: UTF8 or Unicode Karel Zak
• 13:02   Re: UTF8 or Unicode Peter Eisentraut
• 13:43   Development Plans Simon Riggs
• 14:05   Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Andrew Dunstan
• 14:07   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c Nicolai Tufar
• 14:11   Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Simon Riggs
• 14:13   Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Simon Riggs
• 16:07   Re: Where are we on stored procedures? Merlin Moncure
• 16:43   Re: Interesting NetBSD annual report D'Arcy J.M. Cain
• 16:48   Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Simon Riggs
• 17:04   Re: [JDBC] Where are we on stored procedures? Francisco Figueiredo Jr.
• 17:42   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Development Plans Marc G. Fournier
• 17:53   Re: Some download statistics Jim C. Nasby
• 18:13   Re: Where are we on stored procedures? Tom Lane
• 18:18   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Tom Lane
• 18:22   Re: Where are we on stored procedures? Tom Lane
• 18:24   Re: int64/double for time/timestamp Teodor Sigaev
• 18:26   Re: UTF8 or Unicode Bruce Momjian
• 18:28   Re: int64/double for time/timestamp Tom Lane
• 18:33   Re: UTF8 or Unicode Tom Lane
• 18:36   Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Bruce Momjian
• 18:39   Re: Interesting NetBSD annual report Jim C. Nasby
• 18:40   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Development Plans Bruce Momjian
• 18:47   Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Tom Lane
• 18:51   Re: Development Plans Bruce Momjian
• 19:06   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Development Plans Robert Treat
• 19:11   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Development Plans Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 19:18   Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Matthew T. O'Connor
• 19:21   Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Bruce Momjian
• 19:22   Re: Development Plans Matthew T. O'Connor
• 19:24   Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent Tom Lane
• 19:32   Re: Development Plans Jim C. Nasby
• 19:33   Re: UTF8 or Unicode Peter Eisentraut
• 19:36   Re: Development Plans Tom Lane
• 19:37   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Development Plans Peter Eisentraut
• 19:41   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Development Plans Peter Eisentraut
• 20:02   Re: Development Plans Tom Lane
• 20:14   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Development Plans Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 20:18   Re: Some download statistics Marc G. Fournier
• 20:21   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Development Plans Marc G. Fournier
• 20:26   Re: Interesting NetBSD annual report Marc G. Fournier
• 20:36   Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Jeff Davis
• 20:41   Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Development Plans Josh Berkus
• 20:48   Re: [pgsql-hackers] Daily digest v1.4988 (21 messages) Josh Berkus
• 20:54   Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Tom Lane
• 20:59   Re: Development schedule Tom Lane
• 21:02   Re: Development schedule Josh Berkus
• 21:05   Re: [pgsql-hackers] Daily digest v1.4988 (21 messages) Peter Eisentraut
• 21:10   Re: Development schedule Marc G. Fournier
• 21:11   Re: Development schedule Marc G. Fournier
• 21:17   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 John Hansen
• 21:20   Re: Development schedule Tom Lane
• 21:20   Re: Development schedule Josh Berkus
• 21:21   Re: [pgsql-hackers] Daily digest v1.4988 (21 messages) Marc G. Fournier
• 21:26   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Tom Lane
• 21:26   Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Jeff Davis
• 21:27   Re: [JDBC] Where are we on stored procedures? Tom Lane
• 21:31   Re: idea for concurrent seqscans Tom Lane
• 21:33   Re: Development schedule Marc G. Fournier
• 21:36   Re: UTF8 or Unicode Bruce Momjian
• 21:38   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 John Hansen
• 22:17   Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Tom Lane
• 22:29   CAN-2005-0247 yo mero
• 22:34   Re: Development schedule Tom Lane
• 22:40   Re: CAN-2005-0247 Tom Lane
• 23:44   Re: Interesting NetBSD annual report Jim C. Nasby
• 23:47   Re: CAN-2005-0247 yo mero