Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent
Date
Msg-id 200502250518.j1P5Ib711002@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: 8.0.X and the ARC patent  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 18:17 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > For development, this means we will _not_ have a shortened, non-initdb
> > 8.1 release but a regular release cycle with the typical big batch of
> > features.
> 
> Might we set a rough date for Beta freeze for 8.1 then?
> 
> September 30th 2005 ?
> 
> I see only benefit from publishing a not-before date now. It's up to
> Core if it slips, but it'll really help with gaining funding if people
> can accurately determine whether or not features can be added for
> inclusion in the next release. There are lots of potential donors
> waiting, so lets give them some certainty about which release their
> payback will occur in....

Yea, probably September, but you can't dump a huge feature on us in
August either without having talked about it first, so knowing the date
might not be that helpful.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question
Next
From: jtv@xs4all.nl
Date:
Subject: Re: Finding if old transactions are running...