Re: Can we remove SnapshotSelf? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Can we remove SnapshotSelf?
Date
Msg-id 200502250459.j1P4xae07699@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Can we remove SnapshotSelf?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> As of CVS tip, there is no code in the system that uses SnapshotSelf.
> I am wondering if we can get rid of it and thereby save one test in
> the heavily used HeapTupleSatisfiesVisibility() macro.
> 
> There is one place in the foreign-key triggers that uses the underlying
> HeapTupleSatisfiesItself() test directly.  So it seems possible that we
> might someday need SnapshotSelf again as the representation of the
> appropriate snapshot test for a foreign-key check.  But I suspect that
> any future changes in the FK stuff will go in the direction of using
> dirty reads instead.  In any case we could always put back SnapshotSelf
> if we needed it.
> 
> Comments?

I think we should either remove it or mark it as NOT_USED.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: UTF8 or Unicode
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question