Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Development Plans - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Development Plans
Date
Msg-id 200502251737.02484.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Development Plans  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Development Plans  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Am Freitag, 25. Februar 2005 15:42 schrieb Marc G. Fournier:
> Based on past discussions on a 12 to 18 month dev cycle for 8.1, and based
> on past track record, I'd say closer to the 18 month, so figure on June
> '06, with freeze in January of '06 (12 month dev, 6 month beta) ...
> subject to change, but I wouldn't expect a freeze until Jan '06, beta
> period might be shorter though ...

I certainly hope that this is wrong.  I think the past cycles that saw major 
releases every 11 or 12 months were OK, albeit too long for my taste, but 18 
months is way too long both from the users' and the developers' point of 
view.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Development Plans
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Development Plans