Re: idea for concurrent seqscans - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: idea for concurrent seqscans
Date
Msg-id 6997.1109356257@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: idea for concurrent seqscans  (Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql@empires.org>)
Responses Re: idea for concurrent seqscans  ("Jim C. Nasby" <decibel@decibel.org>)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans  (Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql@empires.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql@empires.org> writes:
> I didn't consider that. Is there a reason the regression tests assume
> the results will be returned in a certain order (or a consistent order)?

We use diff as the checking tool.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [JDBC] Where are we on stored procedures?
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Development schedule