Re: idea for concurrent seqscans - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim C. Nasby
Subject Re: idea for concurrent seqscans
Date
Msg-id 20050226000353.GQ84483@decibel.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: idea for concurrent seqscans  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: idea for concurrent seqscans  (Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql@empires.org>)
Re: idea for concurrent seqscans  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 01:30:57PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql@empires.org> writes:
> > I didn't consider that. Is there a reason the regression tests assume
> > the results will be returned in a certain order (or a consistent order)?
> 
> We use diff as the checking tool.

Doesn't the SQL spec specifically state that the only time you'll get
results in a deterministic order is if you use ORDER BY? Assuming
otherwise seems a bad idea (though at least in the case of testing it
makes the test more strenuous rather than less...)
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant               decibel@decibel.org 
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Modifying COPY TO
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: idea for concurrent seqscans